An open petition / discussion about Animation Lock and FFXIV

[Vanguard319]

oo reported to admins? For what disagreeing with you?

if insulting others over a debate that you weren't even involved in, and added nothing to is your definition of disagreeing with someone, then yes.

[RathSkybreaker]

if insulting others over a debate that you weren't even involved in, and added nothing to is your definition of disagreeing with someone, then yes.

pretty sure there are no guidelines as to who can and can't enter a debate on the forums, as you know thats the whole point of them, to get opinions from everyone, and I wanted to stress my opinion that I think that I don't think archers should be like the archers we have in real life because then you have a useless class, unless they go down the road they are going down, ala bard, in which it doesn't really matter if they have it or not because they will be useless DD, as far as bards go anyway, how they take the class? Who knows, but for now it's safe to assume they will no longer be a strong DD...

and added nothing? How about reinforcement for the fact that action lock for archers shouldn't be there? In many situations it's just cumbersome.

[Vanguard319]

pretty sure there are no guidelines as to who can and can't enter a debate on the forums, as you know thats the whole point of them, to get opinions from everyone, and I wanted to stress my opinion that I think that I don't think archers should be like the archers we have in real life because then you have a useless class, unless they go down the road they are going down, ala bard, in which it doesn't really matter if they have it or not because they will be useless DD, as far as bards go anyway, how they take the class? Who knows, but for now it's safe to assume they will no longer be a strong DD...

and added nothing? How about reinforcement for the fact that action lock for archers shouldn't be there? In many situations it's just cumbersome.

So you don't even remember, that's kind of sad.