WoW doesn't have animation lock and their content is not easy mode. If you think it is, then I'm guessing you never did hardmode raiding when it was considered progression.
oo reported to admins? For what disagreeing with you? I'm sorry your butthurt, and as far as logic = logic game or in real life, thats not true considering many things in a GAME can be altered from real life, I don't think we have an ifrit fight irl, nor do we have magic.
log·ic/ˈläjik/
Noun:
Reasoning conducted or assessed according to strict principles of validity: "experience is a better guide to this than deductive logic".
A particular system or codification of the principles of proof and inference: "Aristotelian logic".
:reason
Again if they want to make archers have auto lock, thats on them , but to say that its against "Logic" is wrong, but only in a video game because in a video game your supposed to be able to explore you creativity and imagination something people who want realism in everything don't understand. Its an RPG for a reason. Go play CoD if you want realism, and even that i'm sure you could find -some- flaws.
http://dn.guildwork.com/
I don't want to feed the fire here but if Animation Lock was "Yoshi-'s Vision", then why is he getting rid of animation lock in 2.0? You -can- have archers be able to have their single-shot firing without having to lock them into an animation for 3 seconds after the damage was dealt. What you want is for archers to have to stay still in order to shoot, which is fine, but make it cancel-able in a heated situation.
And also, I'm fairly sure archers in RL were/are able to run and shoot at the same time. Sure, it might not be as accurate, but if you're in a situation where you're needing to run in order to avoid fire, then the enemy is most likely close enough for you to be able to knock an arrow, run and aim, and then release with a decent amount of accuracy instead of just aimlessly shooting them through the air. ESPECIALLY a target as big as Ifrit.
SacredDawnFC.enjin.com
Insulting people in the counter argument isn't going to change their minds. It will make them stick harder to their opinion regardless of whether or not it's right, and think less of your opinion simply because you insulted them. In essence, if you want to try and change someone's mind, come up with a well thought-out response and don't be a dick.
where did he say this? Do you have a link?
Also not to be rude, but if people are petitioning for animation lock's removal, It would suggest that it's not set in stone, and as I said earlier it would have been removed the same time as the rest.
Last edited by Vanguard319; 11-30-2011 at 03:05 PM.
pretty sure there are no guidelines as to who can and can't enter a debate on the forums, as you know thats the whole point of them, to get opinions from everyone, and I wanted to stress my opinion that I think that I don't think archers should be like the archers we have in real life because then you have a useless class, unless they go down the road they are going down, ala bard, in which it doesn't really matter if they have it or not because they will be useless DD, as far as bards go anyway, how they take the class? Who knows, but for now it's safe to assume they will no longer be a strong DD...
and added nothing? How about reinforcement for the fact that action lock for archers shouldn't be there? In many situations it's just cumbersome.
Last edited by RathSkybreaker; 11-30-2011 at 03:04 PM.
http://dn.guildwork.com/
It was in an interview and was stated multiple times in this thread. I'm too lazy to go find the exact interview right now (maybe tomorrow, too busy watching Walking Dead), but I know it's another one of those "Well...we'll fix that when problem we get better servers" topics.
SacredDawnFC.enjin.com
Insulting people in the counter argument isn't going to change their minds. It will make them stick harder to their opinion regardless of whether or not it's right, and think less of your opinion simply because you insulted them. In essence, if you want to try and change someone's mind, come up with a well thought-out response and don't be a dick.
So you don't even remember, that's kind of sad.pretty sure there are no guidelines as to who can and can't enter a debate on the forums, as you know thats the whole point of them, to get opinions from everyone, and I wanted to stress my opinion that I think that I don't think archers should be like the archers we have in real life because then you have a useless class, unless they go down the road they are going down, ala bard, in which it doesn't really matter if they have it or not because they will be useless DD, as far as bards go anyway, how they take the class? Who knows, but for now it's safe to assume they will no longer be a strong DD...
and added nothing? How about reinforcement for the fact that action lock for archers shouldn't be there? In many situations it's just cumbersome.
It's in the first page of this thread.
http://forum.square-enix.com/ffxiv/t...l=1#post460558
Taken from an interview with RPG Site:
Source: http://pc.rpgsite.net/interviews/327...-naoki-yoshidaRPGSite: With the new server systems, will the major game breaking issues such as animation lock, server lag latency, positioning imprecision, and interface lag be greatly reduced?
Yoshida: Yes, all of these things will be fixed.
Kindred - www.kindredlinkshell.com • My XIVPad - http://www.xivpads.com/?profile/1592...onsong/balmung
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.