Even if they're a Tank I'd much rather they used a shorter blade than, say, DRK. A sword doesn't have to be 8 feet long to be held with two hands, and you certainly don't need to dual wield everything that isn't two-handed.But I'm clearly a Pro SAM Tank, that isn't a Tank. And I clearly state about if it was a DPS I would laugh at them for getting another dual wielding DPS even if it was historical. I don't see the point your trying to make.
Fair enough though, if it's a DPS I can see the reason for it using a 2-Handed Katana, I'll admit, but if it turns out to be a Tank I would like to avoid that choice of weaponry as we already have 2, 2 Hander Tanks.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.

Reply With Quote

