Can we please have undersize mode and party numbers on old content?

[Miste]

You have a strange concept of being rude. You just answered with no relevance to anything i was writing. Reason why there was no need to say anything, reason why i answered like that. If you remove your post from this thread you will notice that it doesnt add anything to the discussion, and its kinda a trend lately to just post for the sake of posting.

sorry but just to make you realize your post wast totally useless its like someone asking for a discount and you answer like "hey its not sale period yet wait for it", oh really?

hey can we have a purple sky? The sky is blue at the moment, wait for it, oh really?
get it now?

wow i never thought i had to break these things down. looks like people really need to post something at all costs lol.

So? You could have just said "Thank you for your post, but I meant I want them to not have the restrictions at all" instead of being rude to them and yeah it was rude (you're still being rude infact). If someone posts information you already know you can relax instead of getting defensive. Not everyone is going to understand immediately what you mean at all times (nor would they know, without mind reading powers, what info you currently are aware of already) so when people post and you think they might have missed the issue you raised then you calmly clarify your idea instead of trying to put them down.

Telling them they stated the obvious is just a less obvious way of putting down someone's intelligence. If you are going to get so worked up over someone simply posting something that was probably just trying to offer you info/help then maybe you shouldn't bother posting.

[Lexia]

...

Well you request is pretty pointless also as you want 3.0 content nerfed (that pretty much what unsynced does) when 4.0 is not even out yet.

[Miste]

Thank you for stating the obvious, reason why im asking for a change.

You sure know how to present yourself properly so that people want to support you. /endsarcasm

[MilesSaintboroguh]

If the 2.0 24 man raids didn't get unsynced, then the 3.0 raids won't get it either.

[Jpec07]

Unfortunately, many of the mechanics in the 24-man raids require the alliance system--they'd have to retool a lot of the fights to get around it.

Rather than that, I'd rather have them focus on new content.

Besides, content isn't "old" until we're in a later expansion. The Void Ark story hasn't finished yet, and Void Ark is still a relevant step in the gearing path for fresh 60s.

[basketofseals]

Unfortunately, many of the mechanics in the 24-man raids require the alliance system--they'd have to retool a lot of the fights to get around it.

The game already accounts for it, somewhat at least. I've been pulled into a group that was not mine when we fought Ozma and pulled him without a full alliance.

[Vidu]

The game already accounts for it, somewhat at least. I've been pulled into a group that was not mine when we fought Ozma and pulled him without a full alliance.

I believe a huge problem here would be though that it would be difficult to implement a system that allows you to go in with less then 24 but more than 8 people - currently we're unsyching content that only requires one group; unsyching for three groups could prove to be more difficult.

(let alone the fact that they shouldnt just make every content unsych right away - I get that precious little OP wants to play how he wants and that waiting sucks, but making faceroll content even MORE faceroll cant be the answer)

[Vidu]

To break it down to you: There is a design choice/reason behind NOT making the content synched yet - you seem to believe that thats oh, so easy! Yet it seems to be something the devs cant or dont want to do - we cant unsych normal HW dungeons yet, we cant unsych the old 24 man raids because the devs dont want us to or it would be to complex to adjust the mechanics etc.
She explained this to you since some people dont realise that the easy "fixes" they have in mind arent wanted or wouldnt work - if you get all rude and offended... geez...

[JunseiKei]

You have a strange concept of being rude. You just answered with no relevance to anything i was writing. Reason why there was no need to say anything, reason why i answered like that. If you remove your post from this thread you will notice that it doesnt add anything to the discussion, and its kinda a trend lately to just post for the sake of posting.

Let me direct you to:

She was just being nice. I would say the same thing because you didn't make it aware that you knew that's how it was.

Besides, content isn't "old" until we're in a later expansion. The Void Ark story hasn't finished yet, and Void Ark is still a relevant step in the gearing path for fresh 60s.

Rude
Adjective
1. Offensively impolite or ill-mannered.

It wasn't posting for the sake of posting, especially taking Cleftobismal's statement in mind because that's exactly what crossed my mind.

[Mokkoe]

Can we? like having to wait 45 minutes+ on a queue for void ark when our current team made of 8 people can do it alone is quite frustrating.

I'm genuinely curious on how you'd even get past Cetus with only 8 people, considering how the hydroball DPS check works.