It amazes me that you consider this a problem to be avoided.
If they compensate players every time they completely change the roles of classes in the game, I think that would be a good thing.
Last edited by Spider-Dan; 11-22-2011 at 07:14 AM.
Compensating for things that are broken - good. The reason being that it is a development problem that inconveniences everybody, and was essentially a mistake on the development side.
Compensating because you don't like a change - bad. The reason being that there are things that EVERYONE dislikes about the game. If one person's dislike is compensated for, then EVERYONE's dislikes should be compensated for. The Dev team cannot possibly please every single person, so this is a completely unrealistic expectation. You are not entitled to compensation for this any more than I'm entitled to compensation for the change to CNJ mechanics that I loathed three months ago. Or the year of grinding that I went through now that grinding from 1 - 50 takes a week.
Last edited by Tsuga; 11-22-2011 at 07:51 AM.
There is a significant difference between "ARC is now a worse DD" (something that I accepted without complaint) and "ARC's role is no longer that of a DD, but that of a tank."
A complete revamping of a class's role is not in the same league as patch-to-patch pecking order changes.
Under this logic, why would they ever make any changes at all?If one person's dislike is compensated for, then EVERYONE's dislikes should be compensated for. The Dev team cannot possibly please every single person, so this is a completely unrealistic expectation.
If what you are saying is true, then since other people's dislikes have obviously been accommodated (e.g. classes are more unique), then all dislikes must be accommodated, right? Obviously, that's not even possible.
Apples and oranges.Under this logic, why would they ever make any changes at all?
If what you are saying is true, then since other people's dislikes have obviously been accommodated (e.g. classes are more unique), then all dislikes must be accommodated, right? Obviously, that's not even possible.
Asking for handouts and special treatment as a result of class changes and rebalancing =/= requesting changes because of imbalances and flaws with the game design.
Again, you're asking SE to create a slippery slope for themselves, and I sure as hell hope that they are not stupid enough to oblige you.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.