ahhh as someone who supposedly has excellent reading comprehension skills, this whole statement is pretty confusing, the first statement contradicts the second, based on the final sentence, i would assume that he is saying they are not a replacement, but its still pretty unclear.
could be
There is a misconception. These combos are not a replacement, they are a new system
"self combos arent the replacement for battle regimens"<==== this statement is a misconception. implication becomes self combos are a replacement.
essentially since the point of bayonne posting is usually clarity, this is making things unclear, though i would assume the first part of the statement was an error, and it is in fact a different system. but that is an assumption.