Results 1 to 6 of 6

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    RhaegarFFXIFenrir's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Posts
    254
    Character
    Asagiri Shirogane
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Samurai Lv 80

    Naming Conventions for Accessories in 3.4

    I don't know why you guys decided to change the accessory naming convention for tomestones of scripture gear, but doing so was not a good idea. Before, there was a common theme for all accessories. Aiming was DEX, Casting was INT, etc. The point is, even without reading the text of the item a player knew generally what jobs were going to be equipping said piece of equipment. This naming convention was preserved for the raid gear, but has been changed for the tomestone stuff to Shire something something unintelligible. If it's too late to change it back I understand, but please change back to the old conventions when 3.5 comes out.
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    Ashelia_Ferron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2015
    Posts
    764
    Character
    Ashelia Ferron
    World
    Siren
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 70
    It's like that because the gear is Sharlayan based.

    If you remember,, the Gubal Library normal gear uses the exact same naming convention.
    (3)

  3. #3
    Player
    Lukha's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Goblet W13P13, Ul'Dah
    Posts
    1,441
    Character
    Lukh'a Lybhica
    World
    Adamantoise
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 100
    Working as intended: Eorzean gear uses Eorzean terms, Sharlyan gear uses Sharlyan terms, and gear from other places of origin uses their own terms (Like the Valerian gear from the 160 dungeons). Now that you bring in up, I'm a little disappointed that the Ironworks gear didn't use Garlean class names, but I guess Cid and co had been here long enough to be used to Eorzean names for things by then...

    Basically it's all there for flavor and Lore Reasons, and it's not like it's that much more effort to just look at the stats if you can't remember the new words.
    (1)

  4. #4
    Player
    ZhaneX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    785
    Character
    Zana Amariyo
    World
    Behemoth
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 80
    My biggest gripe with the Sharlayan naming convention is that Tanks are "Custodians". I don't wanna be a janitor!
    (0)

  5. #5
    Player
    Legion88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2014
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    1,527
    Character
    Baradaeg Ryssbhirwyn
    World
    Lich
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by ZhaneX View Post
    My biggest gripe with the Sharlayan naming convention is that Tanks are "Custodians". I don't wanna be a janitor!
    If i remember right "Custodians" were a high rank of elite guards in the roman empire.
    (0)

  6. #6
    Player
    ZhaneX's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Ul'Dah
    Posts
    785
    Character
    Zana Amariyo
    World
    Behemoth
    Main Class
    Thaumaturge Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Legion88 View Post
    If i remember right "Custodians" were a high rank of elite guards in the roman empire.
    It was mostly a joke; though all the same we're not living in the Roman Empire.
    (0)