


I think I quote myself to this
And with all that stuff about suspension of disbelief, I forgot to actually say anything else about the topic!
The only thing that's "silly" is the idea that poses and stances are gendered. There was no good reason for them to be gender-locked in the first place. As to removing these restrictions vs. adding new poses, how about both? Considering that new emotes, dances, etc. get added periodically anyway, and we will probably continue to see more, and considering the minimum amount of work required to allow all players to access all existing emotes and poses regardless of gender, it really doesn't need to be one or the other.
I mean... surely more variety is good? To be honest, the idea that anyone is legitimately against opening up battle stances and other emotes so that there is no longer a gender-lock on them is baffling.
Un-retired Red Mage.
Level 51 procrastinator.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote


