Quote Originally Posted by Saito_S View Post
Yes, but that's not quite what I mean. You're talking about whether you find each job fun to play or not, and (from your list of classes you tried, which doesn't include ANY HW jobs), about changes that 3.0 made to 2.0 jobs.
Indeed, I was more just offering insight
I did not include Heavensward jobs, because I don't like any of the 3. I have AST at 60, but it's my least favourite of the 3 healers. I am not a fan of tanking, but prefer DRK to WAR and PLD to DRK (from what I've played of it). I have always disliked MCH thematically, but was unable to even level it to 31 when I tried to give it a chance.

I guess I should note that I have tried all the jobs in the game. I did not list WAR, MNK, DRG, DRK, AST, MCH not due to not trying, but simply because I do not like them (and thus I never mained them).


What I'm referring to, what utterly baffles me, is declaration that if a certain new class is a certain role, then that is unacceptable, is somehow objctively the "wrong" role for that class, and is cause for the player making the declaration to quit the game. Without even waiting to see what the class is like or exactly how it fits into its role; the idea of X class being Y role is simply unacceptable.

"If they make the egregious mistake of making Dancer a DPS, then I am done with this stupid game." <-- not an exact quote from any one person, of course, but THAT'S the mentality I'm talking about.
I get what your saying here, and I agree. Ultimatums are generally childish and this is the epitome of that. I imagine most people who say this will not actually quit, and I also imagine that Square Enix ignores these. So, in essence, we can pretend they don't exist