You tell me, you're the one who brought them up:Why are ronin by default dishonorable? I didn't even say that. I said a lot of them were, just as Samurai ranks were, but by a default, ronins were not. Your argument, and apparently the person I quoted, indirectly implies that DPS are dishonorable. The reason I say that is because of the fact you single out the tank role as the exclusive role for it to possibly exist in the game. If I'm wrong on that, and that you're not saying DPS are dishonorable (in other words, they are capable of being honorable), then how is this at all a point to argue for the tank role? You would literally be picking out a quality all roles share. Even as far as history goes, I've pointed out reasons why they can fit DPS equally as well as tank... since it's for the same reasons.
Which is pretty pointless to bring up because the fantasy samurai is based on the idealized Samurai.
Last edited by MomomiMomi; 09-16-2016 at 10:06 AM.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.



Reply With Quote

