Quote Originally Posted by B0YRaNmA View Post
You disagree, you don't do anything and reply to the thread with what you believe should be the opposite.
If there's a specific counter that you want to do, quote that specific area and follow up with maybe two or three more counter arguments (have pity on those that truly wants to follows the thread for possibly and pure innovative ideas).
That's how most, if not all, of these arguments and back-and-forth started at one point though. Usually several threads ago.

I know a lot of the people in this thread (and some other regulars who haven't shown up in here yet) have gone back and forth on some of this stuff in a least a half dozen threads before because:
  1. We have different (sometimes wildly so) opinions on both what motivates people at end game and on what a good end game structure would involve.
  2. We're all pretty stubborn and convinced that our answer is at least mostly correct and the other person must just be missing some key point of our argument, and if we can just find the right way to phrase it, obviously they'll come around to our point of view.
So what may have started out as a reasonable conversation has just escalated over time.