Click targeting isn't accruate during battle when you have 8+ mobs clumped together. Like during stronghold battles trying to line up "Doom Spike" to hit as many mobs as possible is a hassle
|----o------o----------------------o--|
----|--------------------------o---|
------|-o----------o-o-----------|
---------|-------o--Y-o-------|
------------|-----o--o-----|
---------------|---o----|
------------------|X|
try to target "Y" under current targeting priorities or with click targeting.
Figure A1) <current targeting system>
|----1------3--------------------13---|
----|--------------------------12---|
------|-2----------7-10-----------|
---------|-------4--8--11------|
------------|-----5--9-----|
---------------|---6----|
------------------|X|
Figure A2) <current tageting system>
|----13-----11---------------------1--|
----|--------------------------2---|
------|12----------8-5-----------|
---------|------10--6-3-------|
------------|-----9--4-----|
---------------|---7----|
------------------|X|
it would take either 8 or 6 cycle targeting under current priorities system.
Figure B1) <proposed "Radial Targeting System">
|---11------12---------------------13--|
----|--------------------------10---|
------|-7----------8-9-----------|
---------|-------4--5-6-------|
------------|-----2--3-----|
---------------|---1----|
------------------|X|
Figure B2) <proposed "Radial Targeting System">
|---13-----12---------------------11--|
----|-------------------------10---|
------|-9----------8-7-----------|
---------|-------6--5-4-------|
------------|-----3--2-----|
---------------|---1----|
------------------|X|
or 5 cycle targets under what I'm proposing.
In figure B1 and B2 every target from first to desired target is a valid battle target. Unlike in figure A1 and A2 where you have to cycle through non battle targets to get to your desired target.
I'm asking for an option to be put in, not for this to be the standard targeting system. If you like the way it currently is stick with it. However if you don't like our current targeting solutions and woudl like to try something else why not this?


Reply With Quote








