Tattoo on the back for all players?

[Skivvy]

Errr, confusing post is confusing! If anyone saw my previous comment, correction is below

Sorry. Legacy pricing was for 3 months of payment. Tattoo is for i believe any 1.0 character.

[Lexia]

And literally, a completely different pattern/design in the same location is really going to destroy that all that much? Like really?

Also, it does not even mean that you were subbed or spent money at that time. The tattoo was obtained from just -logging in- which could have been in the free campaign. So do not give me 'we spent all this money on a failing game!' stuff. That is not true, you could have got it by logging on during the free period.

Well the game was never 100% free.

[Felis]

So i was wondering Legacy players have a Tattoo on there back showing there legacy status from 1.0 etc.

Wrong.
Every characters, created during 1.x, have the tattoo

[Istaru]

Ok, why not?

You get a small tramp stamp at 180 days. Every 180 days, it gets a little bit bigger and more tasteless for every 180 days after that.

The same tattoo for the boys and girls btw, no discrimination here.

[Istaru]

And literally, a completely different pattern/design in the same location is really going to destroy that all that much? Like really?

Also, it does not even mean that you were subbed or spent money at that time. The tattoo was obtained from just -logging in- which could have been in the free campaign. So do not give me 'we spent all this money on a failing game!' stuff. That is not true, you could have got it by logging on during the free period.

I do didn't spend money during 1.0? Can I get a reimbursement for the price of my CE copy the of the game?

[Skivvy]

I do didn't spend money during 1.0? Can I get a reimbursement for the price of my CE copy the of the game?

Well, technically you got a free ARR CE upgrade, so there's that


But anyway, I would say leave the back tattoos off-limit. 1.0 players bought into a questionable game, and this is SE's thank-you. Other tattoos could be cool though.

[Titor]

I do didn't spend money during 1.0? Can I get a reimbursement for the price of my CE copy the of the game?

You got the CE bonus item (onion helm) for buying the CE copy of the game.

You got the tattoo from logging on during the campaign. The campaign was more of an event, you did not have to be subbed

You get legacy bonuses for being subbed a certain amount of time. The tattoo is not a part of the legacy bonuses, nor is it a part of the CE purchase. You can have the tattoo without having a 'legacy' account with the choco, cheaper sub, etc.

[Felis]

1.0 is sacred and must never be touched, and not even a completely different tattoo design on the back would be allowed without defiling the holy 1.0 tattoo. even the arachne shirt of striking is cutting it too close.

The problem is "on the back", because there is already the 1.0 tattoo.
But it shouldn't be a problem to place a new tattoo near the butt ^^

[Skivvy]

But it shouldn't be a problem to place a new tattoo near the butt ^^

I would be amused greatly by bringing tramp stamps into game.

[Istaru]

Well, technically you got a free ARR CE upgrade, so there's that


But anyway, I would say leave the back tattoos off-limit. 1.0 players bought into a questionable game, and this is SE's thank-you. Other tattoos could be cool though.

Fair enough and I actually agree that other tattoos would be ok.