Tattoo on the back for all players?

[myahele]

Men still dont have nipples -Shrugs-

They're there, just hard to notice


Anyways, I'd be happy with a tattoo system for any part of the body.

[Lambdafish]

The complaining from some Legacy members would be unending.

You seem bitter. If I was given an exclusive reward for doing something, I wouldn't want it devalued. I actually respect the 1.0 player status, given how bad a game they were given, and the fact that they stuck through to 2.0.

[Lauwen]

Please no, the tattoo is a thank you/reward/apology for those of us that stuck with 1.0.

By all means a tattoo system otherwise for other body parts could be great.

[AskaRay]

While I think we should have a tattoo system for say...arms...or face etc (a PROPER one)

no back tattoos that are like the Legacy ones. Maybe on the lower back, if said tat system is ever implemented but nothing on the neck/higher back region. Those are fro 1.0 chars only; live with it

(I am not a legacy player.)

[Titor]

Remember, nothing is exclusive in 2.0 and on, since it all shows up in the cash shop etc.

1.0 is sacred and must never be touched, and not even a completely different tattoo design on the back would be allowed without defiling the holy 1.0 tattoo. even the arachne shirt of striking is cutting it too close.

unique titles, a cheaper sub, exclusive mounts, additional achievement points, unobtainable gear is not enough

[Lambdafish]

1.0 is sacred and must never be touched

Through all your sarcasm, you are actually right. 1.0 was a different game essentially and it is dead and gone, never to be seen again, any events and items from 1.0 gone, hell even half the world is gone. all of the game from 2.0 onwards exists in some form, and yes the 2.0 exclusives (with exception of preorder bonuses and merchandise rewards) are available to everyone, as 2.0 is current, and all of the rewards are current.

You have to understand that 1.0 is dead, and all the players have to remember 1.0 by are a few items and a unique tattoo, and that is why those items are very different from 2.0 exclusives, because there is no way we can go back.

[Lexia]

The 1.0 tattoo like other side is like a holy thing it pretty much a status symbol and a thank you from SE for buying a steaming pile of..... cause even though they cancelled the sub during that time still had to buy the game. I only have the 1.0 tattoo showing cause of it meaning otherwise I don't personally find tattoos attractive.

[Emstidor]

No thanks. The complaining from some Legacy members would be unending. They're still bitching about the sylph mount being a goobbue. Nevermind that it looks different from the legacy goobbue...

The Goobbue was a 1.0 exclusive reward, but not a Legacy reward.

[Titor]

You have to understand that 1.0 is dead, and all the players have to remember 1.0 by are a few items and a unique tattoo, and that is why those items are very different from 2.0 exclusives, because there is no way we can go back.

And literally, a completely different pattern/design in the same location is really going to destroy that all that much? Like really?

Also, it does not even mean that you were subbed or spent money at that time. The tattoo was obtained from just -logging in- which could have been in the free campaign. So do not give me 'we spent all this money on a failing game!' stuff. That is not true, you could have got it by logging on during the free period.

[bass9020]

The Goobbue was a 1.0 exclusive reward, but not a Legacy reward.

Further this the tattoo was also just a 1.0 exclusive. Anyone who played 1.0 at all was able to have the tattoo.

On Topic-
I would LOVE a tattoo system that was restricted to certain pieces of gear. Why is that even a thing?