CNJ = WHM and THM = BLM

[EdenArchangel]

So.... can this news be interpreted as major changes from the base happening later, in time for introduction of jobs?
I can't be a black mage without elemental nukes, lol

[Inaaca]

So.... can this news be interpreted as major changes from the base happening later, in time for introduction of jobs?
I can't be a black mage without elemental nukes, lol

I think it should be interpreted as more concrete information is coming very soon.

[Bowen]

Well, I just want to be able to lvl BLM and SMN and not have to be healz
. . . People die when I heal. . . Ask anyone who has partied w/ me on Lindbulm. . .

[Darkhaund]

I think they should have just remade everything instead of trying to fix this broken armory system

[Bowen]

I think they should have just remade everything instead of trying to fix this broken armory system

I like the concept of the Armory system. There is nothing wrong with it in concept really, just that the way the previous dev team made it was not really... good. They could have done a lot better. I respect Yoshi since he is trying really hard to fix this game. Little by little things are changing. And I have faith that by 2.0 we will have the game FFXIV deserved to be.

[Duuude007]

In an effort to close the gap in these WHM/BLM arguments, I have performed an analysis of the canonical backgrounds that FFXIV has provided, and posted in the topic HERE. I pray that this analysis will quell most peoples' concerns, if they view it objectively.

[Jovy]

I'm for whatever changes necessary inorder for me to have an effective nuker. I dont care what skills or abilities they shuffle to make this happen. Most have both jobs leveled anyways so who cares which is which as long as it works. SE please dont make content for NUKERS.... i dont need the threads filled with people ranting about how Moogles can only be done with 7 mages and 1 tank. BALANCE IT!!! Before you release the patch.

[RemVye]

Why is this thread still open?

[Klive]

People are just confused. I, and many others, are not saying that it should be changed or it will be changed. The letter was clear and there is little to no need for "debate". People, including myself, just don't understand why. I would like to know why and how the dots the connect, but where can we go to clear up this confusion? The only resource even remotely capable is these forums. I do not see these threads as whining as much as people trying to find an answer to why our perceived square peg fit in to the triangle hole.