Thread: It's 1.20 not 1.2

Originally Posted by Misteyes

Version numbers are not decimals, or any other numbering system that can have math done on it.

It is, in fact, totally legitimate to have version numbers like 7.5.1.

If it ~really~ bothers you, you can think of it as "1-20" rather than "1.20"

There can't be math done on them, but it still follows that 1.2 is not the same thing as 1.02, but is the same thing as 1.20, just in principle.

I posted this in another thread but technically we don't know what system they're using. Some people do in fact use versions as strict rational numbers, while others just use the dot as a separator.

Since the first numbered patch was 1.15a, we have no way of knowing which they are using (although the "0" would suggest non-decimal), and won't for sure until we get patches after 2.0.

Originally Posted by Vawn

Well isn't this a stupid thing to argue about.

Originally Posted by Nahaara

Isn't this a silly thing to argue about? >.>

If you want I can create another thread about "OMG THIS IS NOT THE TIME TO CHARGE" or "I HAVE THIS GREAT IDEA". Your choice ;D

Originally Posted by Kaizlu

If you want I can create another thread about "OMG THIS IS NOT THE TIME TO CHARGE" or "I HAVE THIS GREAT IDEA". Your choice ;D

I had to +1 this.

Damn, I think I've suddenly stepped into 4chan. You guys argue about everything.

Originally Posted by Answa

1.02 happened. If you knew decimals, you'd know that


Unless, of course, I'm a total idiot and somehow it's not decimals and for some reason 1.10 came after 1.9, and not 1.09...

OP just got pwnd!

Its obvious that they are proper decimals which is why it has been 1.15, 1.16, 1.17, 1.18, 1.9, 1.20, 1.21 etc etc, some people do refer to them and 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8 and 1.9, but if they followed that logic, we would be on v2 now.

1.20=1.2, 1.12 (although it didnt exsist) =/= 1.2 its not rocket science.