More Destroyable Seasonal Items on Mog Station

[Beckett]

Another fixture, Eerie Wallpaper, has been added to the Mog Station. If you ever want to have another wallpaper in your house/FC room/apartment you will have to destroy this wallpaper that you spent real life money on. If you want to put the Eerie Wallpaper back up, you will have to spend another $5. This is unacceptable.

Even the metallic dyes have a way to get them in-game. Fixtures are the only Mog Station items that you have to buy over and over again, even if you already earned them in-game! Please please fix this! Either make it so fixtures are not destroyed when they are replaced or give us a way to reclaim our earned items on the Calamity Salvager or Recompense Officer.

[Celef]

Why would they fixe it considering people are willing to pay 5$ for an IG wallpaper in the 1st place ?

[TiaHariberux3]

Why would they fixe it considering people are willing to pay 5$ for an IG wallpaper in the 1st place ?

Because more people are willing to buy it in the first place if they fix it

[Celef]

Because more people are willing to buy it in the first place if they fix it

Sure but then you loose the money on re-buying for those who did not read it was destroyable or don't care about paying 5$ again ^^"
Both arguments are good, only SE knows whats best for itself ^^"

[Lainio]

If they cost ~1$-2$ I would say it's """""""ok"""""""

But 5 bucks? This is crazy as hell and yes... that's a reason to NOT buy them for me.

See? One costumer less^^

[Ignnis]

I honestly don't even understand why they bother making stuff destroyable in the first place >> just bind it to the players character once its placed.

[Colorful]

I honestly done even understand why the bother making stuff destroyable in the first place >> just bind it to the players character once its placed.

Someone asked why house exterior replacements were destroyed upon removal and they misunderstood the question. Thought the player wanted them saved into a "housing log" of sorts where they can swap without it taking inventory/retainer space or whatever, but it could have been a quick translation. Definitely do agree, not sure why any housing items are destroyed on removal especially with some being exclusive to events or requiring expensive materials to make. :/

[Vejjiegirl]

ure but then you loose the money on re-buying for those who did not read it was destroyable or don't care about paying 5$ again ^^"
Both arguments are good, only SE knows whats best for itself ^^"

Both arguments are good?? I hope your being sarcastic because your argument is absurd.
Your basically saying they are intentionally selling a destructible item for 5 dollars is so they could target people that have no value for money.
I think it is an oversight on squarenix's part, especially since this has happened before (the Chocobo Toy) which was corrected later.

[Celef]

Both arguments are good?? I hope your being sarcastic because your argument is absurd.
Your basically saying they are intentionally selling a destructible item for 5 dollars is so they could target people that have no value for money.
I think it is an oversight on squarenix's part, especially since this has happened before (the Chocobo Toy) which was corrected later.

All i'm saying is that only SE know why they made that choice.
Of course it could be just an error, they might have forgoten to change it in idk, the item code, (the event version being destroyable) and if so will probably fix it asap like they did with the plush, or they might have decided that it should be like for those of us who got it during the event and then it could be intentionnal thus resulting in, yeah, receiving 5$ again, we don't know.

Why is it more absurd to think that a company would want to make money than to think that they would make that kind of mistake on their CS ? oO

[Naunet]

Why is it more absurd to think that a company would want to make money than to think that they would make that kind of mistake on their CS ? oO

It's not absurd, but really we shouldn't be defending it. Why on earth would customers actively advocate for business practices that hurt us?