Thread: 4.0 abilities

Originally Posted by Kit-Kat

I don't have a problem with hotbars at all, my concern is about class gameplay changing on every expansion. Maybe they should go back to their 1 job skill every 5 levels and add traits inbetween.

I think it is time for them to start adding some flare back into already existing skills by introducing Traits that upgrade old skills.

For example, Tank Jobs could get a trait that adds a new additional effect for being in Tank stance such as Paladin gets Oath of Light each time they get hit which increase their shance to block with their shield and incrase reduce damage from their shield block.

Warriors's Tank Stance passive can get a additonal effect that each time they spend their Tank buff stack they will be given a new buff called "Inner Rage" which cause them to gain a small % of HP back from each hit they take.


For DPS

Dragoons can get a passive that adds special debuff or buff effect to their 1,2,3 skills scuh as each time they use their 123 skill they build up a special buff called "Dragon's Spirit" which increase their crit chance or ignore a certain amount of enemy's armor up to 5 stacks.

Ninja can get a passive that gives them a new effect for their 123 skill when they are in their poison stances being that each time they hit a enemy with 123 skills they build up a special DoT called "Blade Poison" with it becoming stronger the higher the stack number up to a stack of 5.

Originally Posted by Shurrikhan

----

Enemies still have Defense just like our characters.

Armor Penetration/Ignore in RPGs often have a much larger damage buff effect than a direct % damage increase buff on enemies with High Defense, such as bosses and the more sturdy monsters in dungeons.

It part of the reason why when a game offers a way to ignore a certain percent of enemies armor/defense that buff is often chosen over direct damage increase buffs.

For example,

if there is a 10% armor penetration/ignore on a enemy with 1000 armor then the enemy is only at 900 defense when attacking it. Then more on to a enemy with 2000 then that enemy is now at 1800 defense.

Direct damage buff is more set and the damage output is often weaker than armor penetration/ignore.

Originally Posted by EdwinLi

Enemies still have Defense just like our characters.

Armor Penetration/Ignore in RPGs often have a much larger damage buff effect than a direct % damage increase buff on enemies with High Defense, such as bosses and the more sturdy monsters in dungeons.

It part of the reason why when a game offers a way to ignore a certain percent of enemies armor/defense that buff is often chosen over direct damage increase buffs.

That's the thing though. At the same gear level, my 300 relative potency (factoring in buffs) attack does the same average damage to a wimpy AoE-burn trash mob or to a boss, unless that boss has a specific form decreasing damage taken, as far as I've seen. Dragon Kick and Twin Snakes, for instance, have identical effects on one's damage.

(Just went ahead and tested this for a few minutes to confirm I wasn't crazy, and every Bootshine and True Strike fell within the same range of damage from either a Dragon Kick alone or Twin Snakes alone, often even the exact same number. Jumped into a DF group for M4N, apologized for being a shitter for a minute in the name of science, and found the same.)

(Testing on multiple levels—53,55, 57, and 60—and mob types in each level has found the same average damage per potency so far.)
Pretty sure the main reason the debuff is preferred in ST group content, just as the self-buff is preferred when AoEing, is that you can adjust more damage with it. Additionally, different calculation layers (your own damage dealt modifiers and then the target's damage received modifiers) will stack multiplicatively (just as with buffs affecting different sources of damage).

(I'm fairly sure buffs affecting the same type, such as simply +%dmg or +%attack speed were confirmed to stack only additively instead.)