
Originally Posted by
Underdog2204
"...that is why you want to change..."
is pretty clearly putting words in someone's mouse. It's also mistaken, as ammo's strength has never been the reason given for wanting the change anywhere in the OP.
He simply asked, rhetorically it would seem, if it was so strong that it somehow warranted a tacked-on annoyance. I would argue that it is not. On the other hand, I'm not sure what you are arguing at all, as the question here has always been first "should we get rid of the annoyance" and only secondly "does the ability's strength warrant that annoyance". You argue that it is strong, but where is the reasoning for that annoyance being the best balancing addition, and against what? Telling someone what their thoughts were and then attacking a subtopic without even addressing the main point is a pretty good way to get people defensive, believe it or not.