Dark knight

[MagiusNecros]

I'm too proud of this answer to only let it be used once, so here you go:

Nah man Tempered Will and Dark Mind should be buffed so you aren't affected by mind effecting abilities like Terror and silences because yeah flavortext. Could just buff TW and have it work like PvP's Purifiy but only on the PLD to further add to it's defenses and make use of it's 180 second cooldown.

Fun fact of the day. A Warrior cannot be pacified while under the effect of Berserk. Useful for one Guildhest and maybe PvP.

[Drkdays]

Where do people come up with these suggestions? Not being snarky I'm honestly very truly curious. Like, what is happening to you in your little world on your server playing DRK that you think it needs these things? o.o

There's been enough threads started about Drk for it to seem obvious that all is not well in the holy lands of Heavensward when it comes to Drk tanking. Each and every patch we've seen has brought changes to the classes. Small tweaks or even big ones. Why do you think that is? We who love Drk tanking and who are not afraid to throw our ideas out there, be they mathematically sound suggestions or massive groundbreaking ones, write from our own personal perspective of how we play our game and bring up suggestions in order to make this beloved class that much better, often without care of the repercussions it would face when compared to other classes. After all, we play the game but we let SE do the designing and number crunching that they are paid to do. We make these suggestions in the hopes that maybe they'll read these heartfelt ideas and say to themselves, "Maybe we CAN make that work." It seems there are always those who say that there is only one correct way to play any class and that cannot be farther from the truth. There are a multitude of ways any class can be played, some admittedly more efficient than others, but all done to ones own playstyle.

[SyzzleSpark]

There's been enough threads started about Drk for it to seem obvious that all is not well in the holy lands of Heavensward when it comes to Drk tanking. Each and every patch we've seen has brought changes to the classes. Small tweaks or even big ones. Why do you think that is? We who love Drk tanking and who are not afraid to throw our ideas out there, be they mathematically sound suggestions or massive groundbreaking ones, write from our own personal perspective of how we play our game and bring up suggestions in order to make this beloved class that much better, often without care of the repercussions it would face when compared to other classes. After all, we play the game but we let SE do the designing and number crunching that they are paid to do. We make these suggestions in the hopes that maybe they'll read these heartfelt ideas and say to themselves, "Maybe we CAN make that work." It seems there are always those who say that there is only one correct way to play any class and that cannot be farther from the truth. There are a multitude of ways any class can be played, some admittedly more efficient than others, but all done to ones own playstyle.

I'm so glad you ended with the word "playstyle" because it speaks volumes.

Regardless of whether SE considers optimum rotations when designing jobs, there is an optimum way to play them, and many people myself included have tried to point out ways and techniques to make the job live up to its full potential in its current iteration. Playing better will save you time, save people that play with you time, grant increased satisfaction from playing in general, and is just straight up more fun. DRK is an incredibly powerful job when played well. Hell its been world first MT in every raid tier since it was introduced.

My personal opinion is that if you aren't playing the job to its full potential (and many of the suggestions made lately seem to indicate such) in its current iteration, you shouldn't be calling for a new/different one. Some of the ideas put forth have been terrifying, and it personally grills my cheese when someone tries to get SE to redesign a job I can play very well, as in my mind that reads "The job should play like this and all the people that can play it well as-is should have to relearn the job they way I want it." DRK isn't a perfect, flawless job, but most of what it needs are very very small tweaks, and most of them are utility-based or very, very small defensive tweaks. Its DPS is PERFECTLY FINE where it is. DRKs that are trailing behind their WAR buddies by hundreds of DPS are doing something wrong. Assuming you both have full uptime a DRK should only be a very small amount behind WAR or matching the WAR depending on the fight. The gap between WAR and DRK DPS is pretty much slashing-debuff-sized. WAR is also a very popular job and is frequently OTing where DRK is MTing, and is often given preferential treatment in raids, which accounts for bigger differences you may see on FFlogs.

Many of us are arguing against you and other posters because your suggestions completely break DRK (making it use HP instead of MP for a resource) or make it completely destroy the other two tanks (bringing the Sole Survivor buff to PVE or boosting Darkside to 30(!)% increase). We're trying to dissuade people from making suggestions that would only lead to months and months of the other two tanks demanding buffs in return since they'd be left in the proverbial dust, or months and months of "DRK: They Broke My Job" threads a la BRD at 3.0's launch.

I see 4% of those people being DRK. Does this help the statement that the difference between the 2 is small?

DRK doesn't lose anything other than Blood Weapon by going into Grit. You still get to use all of your highest potency attacks, and if you're in Grit its assumed you're tanking something, which means you get Low Blow and Reprisal Procs as well.

Statements like yours irk me because hundreds, maybe thousands of us have done the math ourselves (even if we suck at math, like myself) or checked the math of others out of intellectual curiosity to know things like what you're calling into question and asking us to prove again, just for you, because you decided to remain ignorant.

Honestly with SSS now there's zero excuse for not having mathed out this kinda stuff yourself. You can also take a sample size of a given tank on FFLogs and look at things like the % of DPS added with Low Blow and Reprisal for a given group of DRKs (and Blood Weapon which I believe was mathed out to be a 6% increase not accounting for increased mana/Souleater), the % increase of DPS added with Shield Swipe and SwO (looking at AA damage by a factor of 1/3rd for the PLD during SwO uptime, iirc mathed out to be an 11-13% increase) for PLDs, and the % of DPS added with Fell Cleave for WAR and then add those numbers to the following:

Defiance is .75*1.2= .9
Grit is .8*1.15= .92
ShO is .85*(1+(.3/3=1.1)= .935

Deliverance/Maim is 1.2*1.05=1.26
Blood Weapon/Darkside is 1.15*1.06=1.219
SwO/FoF is 1.1*1.1 is 1.21

WAR - 1.26-.9= .36
DRK - 1.219-.92=.299
PLD - 1.21-.935=.275

These numbers are probably off but their proportions relative to eachother between the tanks are more or less correct.

Now add the % increase of Reprisal and Low Blow procs to the .92 from the DRK equation, the % increase of Shield Swipe procs to the .935 from the PLD equation, and the % increase of Abandon abilities to the 1.26 from the WAR equation and you see that DRK has an extremely small gap between Gritless and Grit, and while PLD's is even smaller, PLD can't match WAR with a slashing debuff, but DRK can in a lot of cases and Reprisal+Low Blow are collectively much more powerful the Shield Swipe. WAR is the largest, but it also has Unchained. You could math this out to a 1.055% overall increase if kept on cooldown but we all know WARs don't just sit in Defiance and Unchained every time on recast so its more difficult to account for.

As I said, I'm not a math wiz or a Dervy or anything but even these rough, napkin math numbers show that DRK's MT DPS is the highest, then WAR's, then PLD's (PLD comes close to WAR if given a slashing debuff). In OT DPS, WAR is top, followed very closely by DRK if given a slashing debuff, then PLD.

[Mattelot]

My personal opinion is that if you aren't playing the job to its full potential (and many of the suggestions made lately seem to indicate such) in its current iteration, you shouldn't be calling for a new/different one. Some of the ideas put forth have been terrifying, and it personally grills my cheese when someone tries to get SE to redesign a job I can play very well, as in my mind that reads "The job should play like this and all the people that can play it well as-is should have to relearn the job they way I want it." DRK isn't a perfect, flawless job, but most of what it needs are very very small tweaks, and most of them are utility-based or very, very small defensive tweaks. Its DPS is PERFECTLY FINE where it is. DRKs that are trailing behind their WAR buddies by hundreds of DPS are doing something wrong. Assuming you both have full uptime a DRK should only be a very small amount behind WAR or matching the WAR depending on the fight. The gap between WAR and DRK DPS is pretty much slashing-debuff-sized. WAR is also a very popular job and is frequently OTing where DRK is MTing, and is often given preferential treatment in raids, which accounts for bigger differences you may see on FFlogs.

My personal opinion is that you can. You shouldn't have to play the game the way some random person expects you to before you're entitled to your opinion.

DRK doesn't lose anything other than Blood Weapon by going into Grit. You still get to use all of your highest potency attacks, and if you're in Grit its assumed you're tanking something, which means you get Low Blow and Reprisal Procs as well.

Statements like yours irk me because hundreds, maybe thousands of us have done the math ourselves (even if we suck at math, like myself) or checked the math of others out of intellectual curiosity to know things like what you're calling into question and asking us to prove again, just for you, because you decided to remain ignorant.

I have no idea who these hundreds or thousands of people are. I only asked a question. You said that the DPS difference is minimal however, I would expect to see more than a 24:1 ratio on the leaderboards. Nobody is being ignorant. I'm just not naive. If someone states something to be true, I sometimes ask for proof. If you don't want to prove what you say, that's your choice.

Honestly with SSS now there's zero excuse for not having mathed out this kinda stuff yourself.

How do you figure there is "zero excuse?" I've not "mathed it out" myself. Now what?

[SyzzleSpark]

How do you figure there is "zero excuse?" I've not "mathed it out" myself. Now what?

I dunno, you could try? Instead of demanding for others to spoonfeed you information that you can glean yourself? Ever heard of lmgtfy.com? Same concept.

My personal opinion is that you can. You shouldn't have to play the game the way some random person expects you to before you're entitled to your opinion.

You are always technically entitled to your opinion. But making demands for change when you don't have ground to stand on is something else. And if you're playing poorly, you're just making life harder than it needs to be for yourself and people that play with you, which is infuriating in the face of someone coming to your thread on the forums and saying "hey, if you do this like this, you won't have all the problems that you're citing as reasons for wanting this bombastic change to the job".

[Mattelot]

I dunno, you could try? Instead of demanding for others to spoonfeed you information that you can glean yourself? Ever heard of lmgtfy.com? Same concept.

So what triggers that? I had a guy ask a question in another thread. I answered him. I know I could have said "go figure it out yourself instead of asking us to spoonfeed you information."

[SyzzleSpark]

So what triggers that? I had a guy ask a question in another thread. I answered him. I know I could have said "go figure it out yourself instead of asking us to spoonfeed you information."

Asking for information is different from asking for information and then being like "um I don't believe you, prove it". Particularly when its a frequently asked question that has a generally accepted and well documented answer.

Its like if you came in here and asked "Who has the highest average DPS of all the tanks" and someone answered "WAR" and you were like "I don't see evidence of that anywhere, prove it".

[Mattelot]

Asking for information is different from asking for information and then being like "um I don't believe you, prove it". Particularly when its a frequently asked question that has a generally accepted and well documented answer.

Is there something wrong with asking for proof?

Who generally accepts it? Where is it documented? Who authored this document and when was it's last revision?

Its like if you came in here and asked "Who has the highest average DPS of all the tanks" and someone answered "WAR" and you were like "I don't see evidence of that anywhere, prove it".

What's wrong with that?

Also, you didn't answer my question. What triggers doing it yourself?

[SyzzleSpark]

Is there something wrong with asking for proof?

Who generally accepts it? Where is it documented?Who authored this document and when was it's last revision?

I find asking for proof of readily available information obnoxious, antagonistic, and entitled. All you have to do is work with the numbers the game gives you, and numbers you can find on fflogs.

What's wrong with that?

Also, you didn't answer my question. What triggers doing it yourself?

Only a select few people are mathematically proficient enough to provide you with a 100% accurate answer, and a smaller percentage of those people have time to stop and type it all out. Conversely you can try and do your own math, and then ask others to check it. I.E. the math in my previous post is likely mostly accurate but admittedly does not take everything into account, but it is there for others to see and check and I ceded that it was probably off by some margin, and that it was "napkin" math. I don't want to spend hours of my day trying to find the thread that documented how much of a % increase Blood Weapon or Sword Oath is just because you demand it, so I'm quoting numbers from memory which, even if slightly off, still illustrate the point, which is that DRK's DPS is good and doesn't need the fix that this post suggests.

Asking for information is different from asking for information and then being like "um I don't believe you, prove it". Particularly when its a frequently asked question that has a generally accepted and well documented answer.

[Zari]

Im with Syzzle on this. You dont just ask someone for readily available information and then demand proof when you can type in a url quickly and find the proof right there yourself.

And I also agree that if you aren't playing a class to anywhere near its full potential you shouldn't be able to ask for these huge changes just to allow you to be lazy and still do fine with the class.