Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 ... LastLast
Results 41 to 50 of 249

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Obysuca's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    963
    Character
    Ayaminae Yirien
    World
    Midgardsormr
    Main Class
    Machinist Lv 100
    >_> Is it bad that the thing I was most excited about is finally being able to hide quests? lol
    (10)

  2. #2
    Player
    Toguro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Posts
    378
    Character
    Vinny Falcone
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Lancer Lv 60
    "New optional items have been added!"

    "Armored Pegasus: $30 USD"
    (2)

  3. #3
    Player
    Cetonis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    445
    Character
    Sana Cetonis
    World
    Adamantoise
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 100
    The Bard buffs make no sense. DoT damage was basically the one thing that -shouldn't- have been touched, and yet that's where most of the damage increase is going to hail from.

    Bard's problem is what happens when a fight makes it so that their DoTs just aren't going to be good - this changeset fails to address that, while also introducing risk of overcompensation (making MCH undesirable) depending on what A9-12 looks like.

    It's not consistent with anything SE has said or done in recent times. i.e. they say they want MCH to always be a bit ahead, and then buff Bard's ceiling damage way more than its floor. i.e. they give Monks Chakra and buff Ruin 3 to help those classes shore up weaknesses, and then buff Bard... DoT damage?

    I suppose it's consistent in the sense that SE consistently fails to grasp how 3.0 Bard works.
    (7)

  4. #4
    Player
    RLofOBFL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    787
    Character
    Lala Yuki
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Cetonis View Post
    The Bard buffs make no sense. DoT damage was basically the one thing that -shouldn't- have been touched, and yet that's where most of the damage increase is going to hail from.

    Bard's problem is what happens when a fight makes it so that their DoTs just aren't going to be good - this changeset fails to address that, while also introducing risk of overcompensation (making MCH undesirable) depending on what A9-12 looks like.

    It's not consistent with anything SE has said or done in recent times. i.e. they say they want MCH to always be a bit ahead, and then buff Bard's ceiling damage way more than its floor. i.e. they give Monks Chakra and buff Ruin 3 to help those classes shore up weaknesses, and then buff Bard... DoT damage?

    I suppose it's consistent in the sense that SE consistently fails to grasp how 3.0 Bard works.
    They buffed all of BRD's skillset besides SS HS RS & IJ....what were you expecting? Heavy shot potency increased to 200?
    (6)
    http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/12116351/


  5. #5
    Player
    Cetonis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    445
    Character
    Sana Cetonis
    World
    Adamantoise
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by RLofOBFL View Post
    They buffed all of BRD's skillset besides SS HS RS & IJ....what were you expecting? Heavy shot potency increased to 200?
    I was expecting them to -not- increase DoT damage. This isn't crying that they didn't buff enough - this is saying that they buffed the wrong things. The total pps gain here is about 6.66. A little over 4 of that comes from DoT damage increases which were not needed.

    They could have, for instance, added potency to the initial hit damage of Windbite and Venomous Bite. They could have consolidated Flaming Arrow's damage into 15s or 24s to make it lose less to boss movement. They could have, perhaps, done something a bit wacky like have Sidewinder apply any missing DoTs that it doesn't get damage for. None of these things would have increased Bard's dummy damage by any notable margin, but they would have had real impacts on output in actual combat.

    But instead of aiming their buffs at areas of need, SE does this wholesale buff-everything approach, which creates more potential problems down the road (threat to MCH viability) than it actually solves (BRD still badly lacks resilience to mechanics). It's a very lazy, "here, now stop whining and go away" buff that reflects a complete failure to understand the nuances of the classes involved.
    (4)

  6. #6
    Player
    RLofOBFL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2015
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    787
    Character
    Lala Yuki
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Cetonis View Post
    I was expecting them to -not- increase DoT damage. This isn't crying that they didn't buff enough - this is saying that they buffed the wrong things. The total pps gain here is about 6.66. A little over 4 of that comes from DoT damage increases which were not needed.

    Sorry if I sound dumb but what is wrong with Dots on BRD?
    (0)
    http://na.finalfantasyxiv.com/lodestone/character/12116351/


  7. #7
    Player
    FeliAiko's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2015
    Posts
    591
    Character
    Feli Aiko
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by RLofOBFL View Post
    Sorry if I sound dumb but what is wrong with Dots on BRD?
    It's because BRDs issue in this raid tier was burst, and not sustained damage.
    (3)

  8. #8
    Player
    Cetonis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    445
    Character
    Sana Cetonis
    World
    Adamantoise
    Main Class
    Bard Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by RLofOBFL View Post
    Sorry if I sound dumb but what is wrong with Dots on BRD?
    Bard's problems in current content stem from how weak they are when they can't keep their DoTs running on any targets. Each time they have to either apply their DoTs anew, or forgo them entirely in the case of an add that isn't going to last very long, they lose out on hundreds of potency. Additionally, Flaming Arrow gets undermined by mechanics that cause the boss to be moved around.

    Making the DoT/FA ticks stronger doesn't really change any of this - in fact, it makes the gap in DPS between a Bard-friendly fight and a Bard-punishing fight even wider. While raising the ceiling damage by 5% or so will of course raise the floor damage by a few percent as well, the goal should have been to raise the floor by 6-8% while ideally only adding maybe 1-3% to the ceiling.

    And if SE actually took the time to understand how 3.0 Bard works, there were at least a few relatively obvious ways to make strides towards that goal, and a lot of room for creative solutions as well. Chief among the options would have been a duration compression on Flaming Arrow, better initial-hit damage on Windbite / Venomous Bite, significant oGCD attack buffs, an extension of Straight Shot's duration, addressing the WM vs. River anti-synergy, some way to get consolation damage when DoTs are down, or a couple other things.

    But the Blunt Arrow change is the only thing on that list that they actually did - other than that it's a bunch of fairly thoughtless "we don't know what to do so let's just add a little bit to everything" buff. (Granted the song changes make a lot of sense, but that's sort of a separate category that doesn't take much of any class-specific knowledge to grasp)

    If A9-12 roughly resemble A3, A4, A5, and A8 in style (as in, if A1-2 and A6-7 are true outliers), then the final numerical result of all this could actually be okay. Bard will be a little better in a fight or two, Machinist a little better in a fight or two, and they'd be even-ish in a fight or two.

    But now the onus is on SE to actually produce those suitable fight designs - while also not botching BLM vs. SMN - when they could have had more freedom if they targeted Bard's weaknesses for buffs rather than just making their strengths even better.
    (4)
    Last edited by Cetonis; 06-04-2016 at 12:24 AM.

  9. #9
    Player
    Judge_Xero's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    2,228
    Character
    Divine Gate
    World
    Exodus
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 60
    Quote Originally Posted by Cetonis View Post
    I was expecting them to -not- increase DoT damage. This isn't crying that they didn't buff enough - this is saying that they buffed the wrong things. The total pps gain here is about 6.66. A little over 4 of that comes from DoT damage increases which were not needed.
    The BRD buffs look pretty solid IMO. A higher sustained damage allows for saving of CD's in the need of burst/dealing with mechanics. Blunt Arrow having double potency is a significant increase.

    DOTs Changes -> higher AOE potential without altering burst AOE too much, higher sustained @ a 3.33 pps increase.
    Blunt -> Burst Potential + Higher Sustained
    EA -> Significant Burst Paired with Barrage + Higher Sustained
    Flaming Arrow -> Significant AOE increase
    Sidewinder.....an increase that doesn't change anything significant lol.

    If you look at the single target pps of 6.667 combined from all the changes you will notice that the changes to the DOTs is exactly half @ 3.33 pps. The target here I believe was having the ability to hold burst CD's if required, which it appears to have done.

    For the most part, BRD now has a ~100 DPS increase @ current gear + changes to BV and songs.
    (2)
    Last edited by Judge_Xero; 06-03-2016 at 11:59 PM.
    "I don't always drink beer, but when I do, it's often."
    Temp Forum Ban - July 7th 2016 *** I promise to never call out scrub players again due to it causing a toxic community

  10. #10
    Player
    Altera's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Bergen
    Posts
    1,159
    Character
    Chandani Aranka
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 100
    This patch note was pretty beefy. Looking forward to the 3.3 Patch
    The Moogle beast tribe looks fun
    (1)

Page 5 of 21 FirstFirst ... 3 4 5 6 7 15 ... LastLast