No, your problem is you are removing my argument from the original context in an attempt to skew things in order to fit your narrative and self-righteous delusions. I specifically said what I did in response to the TC and similar situations. I pointed out that both sides, both the TC and the tank, were using DF for their own personal gain. As such, you can't really claim one side is right while the other is wrong. You decided to jump into the conversation to call one side wrong and selfish and then stated that if the tank can't accept your definition of DF, that they should not queue.

That is the origin of this argument and the basis for this discussion. If you can't understand that and want to continue in your delusions, maybe you should start your own thread because it's clearly unrelated to this thread.

As for another blatant case of false equivalency, no, the tank didn't force them to do anything. They both signed up for DF under the same conditions. Contrary to your delusions about what DF should be, DF FACTUALLY IS a match-making system that pairs either a preformed group or random people into a random dungeon with the option to leave with a 30 minute penalty. In other words, when the TC queued for DF, he accepted the possibility that his tank might leave and that he would have to requeue. He accepted the possibility that his group might not clear. The tank didn't force him to accept any of that. The tank also didn't force him not to queue as a tank himself or queue with a tank friend. He made the decision he did, took that risk, and paid the cost. The tank that left the roulette did the exact same thing. He made the decision to roll on the dungeon, took the risk of not getting something he wanted, and paid the cost -- a 30 minute lock-out. They did the same thing. You are the one trying to assume they did something different when both were just trying to play the game they wanted to. Both didn't get what they wanted and both paid a cost. You're the one here trying to tell people how they should play the game.

It's hilarious that somehow you are trying to argue I'm the intolerant one when you are the one that has stated that if we don't play by your rules, we shouldn't play at all. I'm saying we all play by our own rules and there is nothing you can do about it.