

When it comes to Egi's if you are saying that it didn't come down to a lazy bad design then I don't know what to say. They should of never promised new EGI's if they knew that the 3 we class Egi system was all we where ever going to get. I'm not a dev but I'm sure if they wanted to put more effort in to the thought of the Egi's they could of. When it comes to new Fairys I can't really think of what a new one would be use for lol. But if SE want to I'm sure they will find use of a new fairy and will make one.Can you suggest what balanced new abilities a new fairy aspect would have? Eos and Selene cover support and healing pretty well and SCH really don't need more mitigation. Its the same reason they didn't add new Egis. What would be the new Egi's speciality?
That's not lazy. Its the basics of class design.


Dude did I say you in my post no I didn't I said people when people say "Bring Carby Back to SCH".Never once in my post did I say SCH could use Carby's, friend. You seem not to have read...any or most...of my post but okay. I said ACN was able to use Carby's.
Now that we've cleared up those errors in reading, again I state, ACN was a part of SCH. Do SCHs magically stop becoming ACN once they get their job stone? NO. That's why it's called a base class. Did ACN use Carbuncles? Yes, they did.
What you're saying is every SCH somehow magically skipped the first 30 levels and never got to use one and isn't an ACN but okay. Yes, gods, I understand SMN got to use them a bit longer, but Carby's are first and foremost an ACN SUMMON. ACN isn't just magically summonless until you unlock SMN, Carby's are an ACN thing. Isn't every SMN and every SCH an ACN?
Damn you tried it lol. Trying to throw shade in my direction lol.



glamour gears for fairy - 5 star specialist recipes (only true experts can craft fitting gears so small) ^^
I never understood why people wanted new egis over better egis. The current ones are poorly defined as is with minimal gameplay impact. They're just kinda there with very little mechanical synergy.When it comes to Egi's if you are saying that it didn't come down to a lazy bad design then I don't know what to say. They should of never promised new EGI's if they knew that the 3 we class Egi system was all we where ever going to get. I'm not a dev but I'm sure if they wanted to put more effort in to the thought of the Egi's they could of. When it comes to new Fairys I can't really think of what a new one would be use for lol. But if SE want to I'm sure they will find use of a new fairy and will make one.

This is kind of how I'm viewing it. What would another egi really get us, 'cuz they pretty much have the bases covered with a tank for solo play, a caster for ranged, and a more powerful melee. Titan gets minimal use as is. I'd rather they improve faeries/egis and give glamours. Encouragement of transition/more fluid transitions of summons in battle would be nice.
K. Whatever. Dropping this.
Last edited by Indiction; 05-28-2016 at 02:43 PM.
At the next live letter we should all ask for new fairy glam ^^ Maybe we'll get an official answers from the producter.
Maybe they should give Scholars a Valkyrie "fairy" that is focused more on attacking the enemy and shielding allies to prevent damage rather then heal.
Combine with a release of a pet glamour system and they can release a Lenneth reference glamour that would also server as a cross promotion for their latest Valkyrie Profile game. Could combo well with the release of a glamour outfit that is Lightning's Valkyrie themed armor from XIII-2.
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote




