Quote Originally Posted by Snugglebutt View Post
If two people walk into a restaurant, one called Dave and the other John. Both order the same meal for the same price but John gets continuous free bottles of wine to drink with his meal just because he is called John while Dave does not, in my opinion Dave would have legitimate right to be insulted by that situation. It just doesn't feel right to me that both are not entitled access to the same features when pay the same amount. Maybe SE could implement a percentage deduction/reimbursement in house cost for purchase of 'personal' vs 'FC' because they don't get access to the same features as those paying same amount currently.
Oh, you added stuff. Here's the problem with your analogy: they aren't the same meal on the menu. They just look the same, they cost the same, but one is only available to certain parties who qualify and comes with free drinks.