Really? I can't kick Ice Mages? I have to sit there and wipe repeatedly because of their incompetence? I can't kick Bards who don't sing songs? I have to put up them doing nothing useful? It's not like these are players who just need some quick tips, and they go "Oh, sorry" and get it together. These are players who are terrible and looking for a free carry. We are not obligated to provide them with one.
If a group just can't make a DPS check on a fight, there are two options:
1. Disband
2. Replace players
2 is preferable, and only possible if you know who to replace.
Last edited by dragonseth07; 11-12-2016 at 02:08 PM.
We've gone over this time and time again. Kicking someone for playing poorly is perfectly allowed under difference of playstyle clause. If the kick passes, you were the minority.
You are free to kick. You just need to hope that the player kicked doesn't report you and if they do, that the GM who investigates it agrees with you. "Difference of playstyle" is up to the GM's discretion.
Last edited by SDaemon; 11-12-2016 at 02:28 PM.
The GMs have gone on record as stating that that is a perfectly valid reason to kick. Like this is an official statement. I wouldn't have anything done to me for kicking a 600 DPS blizzard wizard
Edit![]()
Last edited by Daranion; 11-12-2016 at 02:15 PM.
Again, it is up to the GM's discretion.If the concern is that this will be used as an excuse to abuse the feature, if our investigation determines that they did perform their duties in an appropriate manner and were kicked due to unrealistic expectations, then it could be found to be an abuse of the vote dismiss feature. A GM investigation will make the final determination about if the feature was used appropriately.
LGM Enkrateia
and again, that still means blizz wizzes and lazy DPS that auto attack or spam a few attacks while watching netflix are kicked no penalties. It all works out in the end.
A personal parser would not be bad. If you know what numbers you need to shoot for it can help you improve and pinpoint troubles.
A public one, however, no. It would not go well.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.