Would you like an in-game parser?

[Lambdafish]

snip

I interpretted the OPs posts (both in my calculation and voting) as:

"Yes, I would like an in game parser." - in general, in any form
"Yes, but I would only like a personal in game parser." - specifically personal parser.

My assumption is that anyone who voted for wanting a parser, but did not vote for personal parser only wants a group parser. This would also mean that your stat breakdown for "no vs. yes (group parser)" is now a "no vs. yes" in general.

[Ghishlain]

I interpretted the OPs posts (both in my calculation and voting) as:

"Yes, I would like an in game parser." - in general, in any form
"Yes, but I would only like a personal in game parser." - specifically personal parser.

My assumption is that anyone who voted for wanting a parser, but did not vote for personal parser only wants a group parser. This would also mean that your stat breakdown for "no vs. yes (group parser)" is now a "no vs. yes" in general.

That's understandable and I can see where you're coming from. As I mentioned earlier my interpretation was "Yes, I would like a parser that is unrestricted (aka, group parser)" since I feel when people talking about a parser in general, they mean one without limitations or restrictions.

I can see both ways so it would be nice to get some clarity since you know what they say about assumptions. lol.