Would you like an in-game parser?

[Kallera]

I still don't want parsers in the game, mostly because I see the problem of people getting into arguments and infighting in DF and PF to get worse. even if it exists outside of chat, I don't want using the numbers to exclude and berate others to become commonplace.

[Seraphix2407]

I still don't want parsers in the game, mostly because I see the problem of people getting into arguments and infighting in DF and PF to get worse.

It already happens for a reason, because people play how they want and it ruins for the other players. Blame them.

[Destous]

I still don't want parsers in the game, mostly because I see the problem of people getting into arguments and infighting in DF and PF to get worse.

Objective information is never a bad thing. More people are reasonable than unreasonable. You'd have to be a complete misanthrope to believe that parser data would turn most of the community into elitist assholes.

[Krissey]

Yes, I would like an in game parser.

I liked this post.

[Kallera]

Objective information is never a bad thing. More people are reasonable than unreasonable. You'd have to be a complete misanthrope to believe that parser data would turn most of the community into elitist assholes.

I do not want the parser. I learn, I try strats and strategies, and i do my damndest in df, but I do not want the parser. I don't want it forced on me as a player, or waved in my face when I play.

[Zojha]

Again, just because there's always going to be inequality doesn't mean you don't try to close the gap. You seem to ignore that point.

Do I? Nowhere do I claim you should not close the gap, nor do I even discourage it. Truly, I am going on in great detail how to close the gap that exists effectively and in a lasting manner. In case you missed it, again and brief this time: If you truly want to close the gap, enforce the rules already in place. Full stop. This makes the implementation of any third party program on terms of equality redundant because equality already exists under these circumstances. Full stop.

I have addressed that point before you even made it. Then, I addressed it again. And yet you claim I ignore it. I'm honestly not sure why you comment on a condescending tone in my post(s) when you apparently don't even read them anyway. But have fun pushing your agenda!

[Krissey]

I do not want the parser. I learn, I try strats and strategies, but I do not want the parser. I don't want it forced on me as a player, or waved in my face when i play a dps.

What difference does it really make? There are already trolls, shitlords, assholes and plebs in the duty finder on any level anyway. They're already there. They're alive and well and making duties hell just for funsies and onesies. So what difference does it make? It's not like there's a flat 0% of mean people in the duty finder right now. It probably won't even make "more" - it will just be the same nerds doing the same thing.

[RickXRolled]

I do not want the parser. I learn, I try strats and strategies, and i do my damndest in df, but I do not want the parser. I don't want it forced on me as a player, or waved in my face when i play.

You must love taking exams without being graded.

[Kallera]

You must love taking exams without being graded.

I hate taking exams every day.

[Krissey]

I hate taking exams every day.

Oooooh....it all makes sense. You're afraid of failing the DPS test. What if it turns out you're always top DPS and the best? Would you care about parsers then? If you knew you had nothing to worry about?