RENT: A Better Housing Solution

[Kazrah]

The entire time of reading your post I was thinking, "Is The ShamWow guy you seen on TV ads on the ffxiv forums now"? Lol

Great idea otherwise I fully support this approach

Actually I was thinking more of that green Protostar guy from Wildstar, complete with that cheesy 50s marketing music.

Also thank you to those of you correcting my math, and has been readjusted to 0.1% to ensure that rent level stays the same. As you can tell, I'm no math major, just a guy who cares about the housing market.

I'm not a fan of the idea. I already paid for my house, I shouldn't have to pay extra because everyone doesn't have a house.

The point is not having to worry about the amount, but rather that you have to do the activity. I liked the housing token idea too, but gil seemed more ideal to me since that's already a thing and it's easier to control rent pricing in case housing demands increases further.

You will eventually learn life isn't fair.

No one likes Mr. Whiny-pants.

[Lithe]

No one likes Mr. Whiny-pants.

I'm sorry. Who made this cry baby thread again? c:

[Kazrah]

I'm sorry. Who made this cry baby thread again? c:

If this started as a crybaby thread, then why are you the one crying about a reasonable suggestion for a housing solution? I respect your counterargument that those with housing deserve to keep it, and they rightfully should, but with the extra housing in 3.3 and the 45-day timer being just a few buckets of water on a wildfire, permanent housing is still not a suitable long-term plan, especially for new players who do want a house and can't because of people who have lost interest in the game.

[StouterTaru]

a reasonable suggestion for a housing solution?

It's neither reasonable, nor a solution. It's a poison ivy band-aid on a bullet wound.

How about you lose a level on each class every day unless you visit an NPC and perform some tedious task on every class? That's reasonable.

Or they add one house to each server? That's a solution.

[Lithe]

If this started as a crybaby thread, then why are you the one crying about a reasonable suggestion for a housing solution? I respect your counterargument that those with housing deserve to keep it, and they rightfully should, but with the extra housing in 3.3 and the 45-day timer being just a few buckets of water on a wildfire, permanent housing is still not a suitable long-term plan, especially for new players who do want a house and can't because of people who have lost interest in the game.

In what world is this reasonable? How about we make new housing so overpriced people can't afford more than one? It's about as reasonable as your solution. c:
Anyways, i'm done talking to you and in your crybaby thread.