Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Buff priority?

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    Titor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Garlemald
    Posts
    1,228
    Character
    Titor Jaraba
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Alchemist Lv 100
    Because the offensive debuff is really dangerous without the def debuff. Plus it helps buffer blood for blood damage and generally lets the buffed dps last longer which. So they will either focus you without the def, but you are not attack buffed, or focus the buffed melee with the damage buff and no def buff. Which do you think is better? (This question is kind of subjective, not being sarcastic. I think different people think different things. Personally I like when the melee grabs both)
    (0)
    Last edited by Titor; 04-29-2016 at 04:19 AM.

  2. #2
    Player Vaeria's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Bastok/ S. Gustaburg...now and always.
    Posts
    402
    Character
    Devil Panzerfaust
    World
    Excalibur
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 80
    Assuming youve expereinced this OP since youve made a post about it (actually been to Tonberry-elemental and ended up coming back BECAUSE it was so polite there (no ghostly teabagging lalas named knives just makes my life boring >_>) But ya, since, im guessing, people in general dont see blm as top tier, melees feel more inclined, when in pt with one, to do the job themselves and let the blm be cannon fodder lol. Wouldnt take it personal..sometimes tanks take offensive buffs in view of continued offense over squishy dps.
    (0)