Results -9 to 0 of 145

Threaded View

  1. #37
    Player JackFross's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    680
    Character
    Eve Malqir
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Dragoon Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Gameplayzero View Post
    i'm confused?
    Eos and Selene are both incredibly powerful and are not affected by Cleric. They out-class Regen in effectiveness in most situations, primarily because they cost me 0 GCDs and require me to spend exactly 0 time out of Cleric Stance.
    Eos also offers Fey Illumination every 2 minutes - a 20% boost to heals given by itself and any party members who get hit. WHM gets that, it's an extra Divine Seal.
    Eye for an Eye and Virus are also very important. You basically brush off the fact that ACN Virus is the only Virus that is actually useful in 90% of situations where you want a skill like that. It's very - very - rare that you are using Virus for the physical effect of it.

    That said, I did not contradict myself. Allow me to explain.
    I can say in one post the following two statements and not have it be a contradiction:
    "White Mage burns more Mana while DPSing than Scholar does, which causes them to OOM faster in that situation."
    "The main reason White Mage does not DPS as much as Scholar in raids has nothing to do with the Mana cost of their DPS skills."

    These two things are not mutually exclusive. The second implies that the first is an issue, just not the primary concern. And it is not the primary concern, as I explained in my post with discussions about SCH having 3-4 GCDs out of Cleric which eclipse what WHM can do with those same 3-4 GCDs, because SCH has more burst damage in the first few hits while WHM eclipses SCH when the damage window extends longer than that, because WHM has higher and more potent sustained DPS.

    Like. These are facts. I'll show you numbers at the end of this post.
    Quote Originally Posted by Gameplayzero View Post
    I just assumed we were ignoring accuracy all together
    This is another factor that would play into "reasons WHM is not DPSing as often as SCH which do not relate to the WHM's Mana efficiency" argument. I didn't state it, because, honestly, it slipped my mind at the time. It's absolutely valid, though. Bio II and Bio having 0% miss rate does matter in terms of DPS in a raid scenario.
    Quote Originally Posted by Kaurie View Post
    The fact that the SCH can sustain high DPS for longer than the WHM due to MP constraints is why the SCH has higher sustained DPS.
    You're completely off-base, but let me try to explain this to you in a more concrete manner under a cut so as not to overly clutter this thread.

    Let's assume the healer has 4 GCDs in which they can turn Cleric Stance on in order to drop some DPS. Pretty sweet! What do the two Healers do with this time?

    SCH:
    Bio II > Miasma > Bio > Energy Drain > Aero > Energy Drain
    WHM:
    Aero III > Aero II > Aero > Fluid Aura > Stone III

    Let's compare these, shall we?
    SCH:
    35x10 + 20+35x8 + 40x6 + 50+25x6 +150x2
    350 + 300 + 240 + 200 + 300
    1390

    WHM:
    50+40x8 + 50+50x4 + 50+25x6 + 210 + 150
    370 + 250 + 200 + 210 + 150
    1180

    Flat out, the SCH just started /way/ higher than the WHM just did. Easily eclipsing what the WHM can do in that short burst period. You could even turn that Aero into a Swift Shadowflare for an additional +50 if you don't need to save it for anything else down the road. You could argue squeezing Assize in here, sure, which would bump WHM up above SCH! the problem with this becomes that you're then taking a significantly valuable heal spell away from the party for DPS in single-target. So... I dunno about that!

    Either way, we'll continue to ignore Assize for this purpose and discuss the extended DPS rotations of WHM and SCH.
    Lots of numbers down there v

    WHM is nice and simple.

    A3>A2>S3>S3>S3>S3>A2>S3>S3>S3>repeat.
    The total potency of this is
    9 gcds (2.45s each) + 1 A3 (2.95s) = 25s = 8.33 dot ticks
    50x3+210x7+90x8.33 = 2370
    2340/24s = 94.8 pot per second
    Presence of Mind!
    Every 150s, we get +20% attack speed for 15s. 10% of the time +20% speed. This translates into an average of +2% speed, meaning we move 2% faster, so complete 2% more actions in the same amount of time.
    97.5 x 1.02 = 96.7

    In addition, we have every 30s where we'll replace 1 S3 with 1 A1+Fluid Aura
    S3 = 210
    A1+FA = 200 + 150 = 350 = +140 pot every 30s = 140/30 = +4.67 pps

    Total: 96.7 + 4.67 = 101.37 pps.


    SCH is more complex...
    Works out something like:
    SF>B2>M>B>A>Broilx4>A>B>M>SF>B2>Broilx2>A>B>Broilx2>M>Broil>A>B>SF>B2>Broilx2>A>M>B>Broilx5>repeat.
    Adding it up:
    SF x3
    B2 x3
    M x4
    B x5
    A x5
    Broil x16
    33 GCDs + 3 Shadowflare = 33x2.45 + 3x2.95 = ~90s = 30 ticks.
    DoT potency:
    25+35+35+40+25 = 160
    Skill potency:
    Broil: 170x16 = 2720
    Miasma: 20x4 = 80
    Aero: 50x5 = 250

    Rotational potency:
    2720+80+250+160x30 = 7850
    7850/90 = 87.2 pps.

    But, wait! You also get 3 Energy Drains every minute!
    150x3 = 450
    450/60 = 7.5 pps

    But, what about Dissipation? If I'm going full dps...
    That adds an additional +3 Energy Drains in 3 minutes (180s)
    450/180 = 2.5 pps

    Total overall potency:
    87.2 + 7.5 + 2.5 = 97.2



    In summary, if you don't feel like reading how I arrived at these numbers...
    WHM potency per second = 101.37 pps (Cleric: 111.50)
    SCH potency per second = 97.2 pps (Cleric: 106.92)
    Difference: 4.17 (Cleric: 4.58)

    This isn't taking into account:
    1. Assize. (300/90 = +3.3 pps)
    2. WHM have naturally more MND than SCH.
    3. Foe Requiem - which only expands the disparity.
    4. The fact that, each rotation for SCH I listed will miss out on ~4 ticks of Aero and 1 tick of Bio (a loss of ~1.5 pps)

    So, yeah. White Mage runs out of Mana faster than Scholar, so they can't go as long doing straight up DPS.
    A White Mage doing everything completely right will still hit zero around 3 minutes. This is absolutely accurate.

    The issue with this line of thinking when using it to argue that SCH has more sustained DPS is that you're ignoring the fact that in literally any situation where this might be a thing you're concerned about, it's not a thing you're concerned about. Even IF you're going 100% DPS healer 100% of the time in literally any relevant content, there is never a stretch of time where you will be allowed to dps with 100% uptime for a stretch of 3 minutes or longer as a healer OR as a DPS. There's always times for your Mana to regenerate (Boost, between A6 bosses, in the healer Jail/during Searing Wind in heart phase), or periods where you need to be healing, not DPSing (healer Jail A7/A7S, for instance).

    Always. So it's a silly argument, basically.

    And this isn't the place for this argument.
    (2)
    Last edited by JackFross; 04-30-2016 at 07:23 AM.