The Feast PvP Player Interviews!

[Tohu]

But that is what i mean, it requires personal investment and muscle memory, that's it.
Being good in reactive, competitive gameplay requires you also to invest time - into your life. E-Sports is the word, like any other "Sports" it requires a healthy lifestyle to have your body and mind in good shape and outperform others. Also it requires the same or even a higher level of communication skills with your team.

Let them get viewers, that's just a part of community building, it doesn't seem wrong to me. FFXIV has a lot potential, also for pvp content, you are blind if you can't see that. But the community needs to show interest in it, so the producer will find it worthwhile to invest into that.

I'd only stream for the mere reason of others asking me to watch to maybe improve or tell me what I could do better.

[xxczx]

isn't amas there to give more exposer

isn't pretty much everything on the internet done to

idk

make money

what is life

[Cinera]

I'm playing with Etro since Feast began, and I see him putting lot of efforts to increase the FFXIV pvp community bigger with a good spirit. I don't understand why some people are coming so judgy or giving him bad intentions.
Peace on Eorza !

[Holicccc]

WHO ARE YOU???

[kalasnikov]

I have nothing do with Soren my boy ;D. You are just proving the pf correct.

[Chl]

yo lets not bring MogCn into this. We're not clones who all hold same view ^^; Do not think it is at all relevant and is IMO unwarranted. Only about 3ish people in the entire FC do PVP regularly and would even be aware of this stuff.

[FunkYeahDragons]

In lieu of further derailing (looks wonderful when people give it 4 pages of attention, by the way), what about taking relevant questions from players for the stream? Mogtalk did this for their Feast episode and C'eve's insight on healing helped one of my friends out who'd posted the question. However, there are a lot of areas they haven't touched on and a lot of topics people still want to hear opinions on, while players will have different areas of expertise and approaches.

[ShaluaLie]

Damn whats with that explosion of hate?

He's trying to help out the pvp community by getting some one on ones with pvpers that do stream and its easier to find pvpers that way that actually like it and helps ppl who want a diff way than reading guides/reddits with more on point way in hearing how different ppl play pvp.

You're thinking way to deep into this.

everyone plays differently and is a good way to hear how they play and get ppl who wanna learn more ways they can be versatile.

not the usual atk smn then healer then blablabla.

You adapt and its a nice way to gain more publicity to the pvp scene.

[RiceisNice]

It's really a tricky thing to handle, especially in regards to PvP content. The most important thing is to be the interviewer (OP) to be impartial to who he picks (it shouldn't be anyone he's familiar beyond conversation), and it's generally best to keep it 1:1. The moment you have associated people or group talk, it can easily turn to an entire session of circle jerk or ego boosting (intentional or not, esp retrospect it's really not a good viewing experience for either side).

Non-open ended questions with straight responses imo would be the ideal way to get the message across with promotion feast gameplay. It can get view points across and allows them to show passion for that content. Even text interview is good for keeping things (mostly) objective.

And that's why I'm not really interested. I'm not interested in getting to know these people. As ironic as it may sound, I don't want to hear an interview of someone I don't already know and love. Part of me thinks that maybe the OP is just framing the idea in a weird way, but I'm not too sure.

Right here for example. It's one thing to just read or engage with them on the numerous discussions, but it doesn't really get the entire point across. Everyone has a different perspective on a game and that's the whole point of an interview to begin with. Whether or not it's relevant is on the interviewer to keep it on track and objective, and the interviewee to get their intentions across (which is mostly on them, whether or not they want to speak about their perspective, among other things)