Ultimate PvP Incentivizing Tweak?

[Canadane]

If anything I'd like them to remove tomestones from pvp matches altogether.
This would stop people who have little interest in pvp from participating.

[Ghishlain]

If anything I'd like them to remove tomestones from pvp matches altogether.
This would stop people who have little interest in pvp from participating.

Alternatively just double the Tomestone rewards but only award those Tomestones to the team that wins. Basically the winners are walking away with the loser's Tomestones.

Those looking to us PvP to farm Tomestomes will have incentive to win and PvPrs can just spend their time getting better while getting their weekly cap on the side without issue. It'll also filter out the trash that has no reason to be there.

[Serilda]

Alternatively just double the Tomestone rewards but only award those Tomestones to the team that wins. Basically the winners are walking away with the loser's Tomestones.

I'd be happy with that. On average you'd ideally be earning tomestones at around the same rate, with more effort leading to more rewards, and it completely destroys any incentive for PVP-haters to leech. They finally fixed the age-old match fixing exploit with PVP this week so maybe they'll be able to implement this adjustment in a reasonable timeframe, too.

FL having a reward either way doesn't bother me as there's a higher chance of loss and I feel that there's already a lot of bandwagon-jumping because of perceived imbalances between GCs. That and it never pops any more for me. But The Feast could definitely use some incentive balancing.

[Ibi]

If anything I'd like them to remove tomestones from pvp matches altogether.
This would stop people who have little interest in pvp from participating.

It's certainly tough to make a decent argument for rated Feast matches awarding it, and if they'd kept it out of Feast completely, perhaps they wouldn't have effectively killed Frontlines.