
Originally Posted by
Ilitsa
I am disregarding nothing. You are trying to double-dip with it. You say it's ok for there to be exclusives, but it's not ok for there to be exclusives. Which do you want? This thread isn't about Lightning's Gear, and I've not brought it up once. This is about the Moogle Attire, which was rewarded to those of us that attended live, OR bought the live stream ticket for it, of which you had close to 8 months to purchase a ticket and get a code at any point. The state of 1.0 does not matter now, in 3.0, I'm sorry, but it's true. The game is vastly different now, and the 1.0 players get plenty of "apology perks" with a 3 dollar cheaper/month sub fee. How is it ok to take away a 2.0 exclusive, while still defending 1.0 exclusive character items?
cher·ry-pick
verb
gerund or present participle: cherry-picking
1.
selectively choose (the most beneficial items) from what is available.
"the company should buy the whole airline and not just cherry-pick its best assets"
That is EXACTLY what you are doing.
Edit: Don't take this as me being against the gear being in the Mog Shop, I just feel that if OUR 2.0 exclusivity is taken away, that ALL exclusivity should be taken away as well. Legacy players can keep their cheaper sub fee, that's fair. but under your very own statement, novelty items (which, yes, includes mounts and symbols on the character) are novelty. Again, you don't get both. It has to be fair and be one or the other.