Bard in the party... thoughts?

[RiceisNice]

(Missed space in last post)
PS : PS : It's funny to see people recruiting MCH only for static, but I guess that just proves the point.

Likewise for 3.0~3.1 when the inverse was true. But honestly, when statics are straight up refusing specific jobs for the sake of progression, it proably isn't a good static to be in to begin with. Before MCH was also consistently behind BRD on top of having less representation, but it still didn't stop groups from taking them in.

[Slyqc]

Likewise for 3.0~3.1 when the inverse was true. But honestly, when statics are straight up refusing specific jobs for the sake of progression, it proably isn't a good static to be in to begin with. Before MCH was also consistently behind BRD on top of having less representation, but it still didn't stop groups from taking them in.

So your point is, do not balance the classes because MCH had his hard time in previous patch so this time it's time for Bard to have a hard time? (That's a lot of time. lol)

[Tsilyi]

I honestly don't know how you came to that conclusion after reading Flo's post...

[RiceisNice]

So your point is, do not balance the classes because MCH had his hard time in previous patch so this time it's time for Bard to have a hard time? (That's a lot of time. lol)

No, I'm saying that parties who don't take BRD because of reasons like fflogs most likely aren't good parties anyway if they are taking the job over a player. And in a meta sense, BRDs have been uncontested since 2.x for party compositions, only until 3.x did they start competing for a raid slot (and they were still better at it in certain areas, and is still the case now but to a lesser extent.)