Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24
  1. #11
    Player
    MilaDazol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    35
    Character
    X'shtola Abba
    World
    Balmung
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Solarra View Post
    Tenants
    Tenants seem to have little, if any security. Since the house will be reclaimed if the owner is inactive, regardless of how active the tenants are, tenants stand to lose not only access to a house and gardens they might be using but also any items of furniture that break on removal. Again, it's unfair.
    Tenants will never be able to reset the timer, because personal housing is a luxury contrary to FC housing which is a necessity, so that way the plots can be free again faster.
    (1)

  2. #12
    Player
    Solarra's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    887
    Character
    Sylbritt Muscadet
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Archer Lv 89
    I think the tenant system needs looking at because it puts people in a position where what happens to their belongs depends entirely on the behaviour of another player. The owner goes inactive, they lose all the fixtures in their room, possibly some furniture along with access to a house.

    Tenancy is a good stop-gap while houses are in such desperately short supply. I can see that allowing tenants to take over a house where the owner goes inactive or wants to relinquish could be very problematic and open to abuse, so I understand why Square don't allow it.
    However, I don't see why they cannot save the entire contents of a tenant's room and store it indefinitely so they can become a tenant elsewhere or transfer all their stuff to the new apartment housing when it becomes available. Same with people who are kicked from their FC.
    (1)

  3. #13
    Player
    worldofneil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Posts
    2,650
    Character
    Scott Pilgrim
    World
    Omega
    Main Class
    White Mage Lv 100
    Sorry, but I disagree that any changes are needed for tennants. Tennancy was only added because people wanted to share a house with a partner or friend and I think a lot of people were probably surprised when they allowed it to be shared with 3 other people instead of just 1. Ultimately though, it is the still the house of the person who's name is on the deed.

    If it's a group of people then they should be using a FC house, although having the option to change a personal house to an FC house (one-way only) would be brilliant.
    (5)

  4. #14
    Player
    Powe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Location
    Guarding Etro's Throne with Lightning
    Posts
    728
    Character
    Hades Pluto
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Summoner Lv 80
    I read that people are worried about the houses not being enough to stabilize the economy, why not make it where you have to pay a monthly bill for the house.
    (0)

  5. #15
    Player
    Neira's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    118
    Character
    Neira Velithe
    World
    Diabolos
    Main Class
    Pugilist Lv 64
    Shared housing with a shared decay timer had the potential to be a genuine remedy to the current system. If every personal house out there all of a sudden had three more people using it and able to keep it as their own, there would be considerably fewer people actually needing a house. Yes, it would have the potential to be abused in the fact that someone could refresh it for all four people, but that's still one person who is playing and paying for that house compared to the glaring flaw with hundreds of homes purchased for resale with no use at all.

    They wouldn't have literally quadrupled the number of home owners, but I don't think saying it's been doubled would be unreasonable. It also didn't take extra server space, and every ward addition will compound the number of home owners. Yet, with the way shared housing currently works, people can literally watch their homes be scheduled for demolition because the one owner hasn't logged on, even if the three tenants are there constantly.

    It just seems to me that it's only about the money in this case.
    (5)
    In older MMOs, such as Ultima Online, there was a house maintenance fee you had to pay weekly, but in FFXIV: ARR we decided against this system. Similarly, these older MMOs also had a system where your house would break down if you didn’t log in after a while in order to have you continue your subscription, but this is a thing of the past and we won't have any system like that.

  6. #16
    Player
    Andrea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    553
    Character
    Princess Andrea
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Alchemist Lv 90
    Quote Originally Posted by Solarra View Post
    I think the tenant system needs looking at because it puts people in a position where what happens to their belongs depends entirely on the behaviour of another player. The owner goes inactive, they lose all the fixtures in their room, possibly some furniture along with access to a house.
    Outside of a window to get their stuff if the house goes I dont think tenants need anything else.

    They didn't purchase the house, they are trusting the owner and imo shouldn't be able to reset the timer.
    (1)

  7. 03-18-2016 07:19 AM

  8. #17
    Player
    Victoria_Silverdawn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    79
    Character
    Victoria Silverdawn
    World
    Louisoix
    Main Class
    Conjurer Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Syrehn View Post
    They never confirmed that the apartment style was going to be Ishgard housing as far as I'm aware did they. I could have sworn it was coming before Ishgard. Do you have a source?
    Letter from the Producer LIVE Part XXVI Digest (01/12/2016)

    0:33:32
    Q: Auto-reclamation for housing starts this month, but can you tell us if there will be any future additions of plots?
    A: We'll be increasing the number of plots for existing housing areas in Patch 3.3. After we expand those areas, we'll add apartment-style housing in Ishgard areas afterwards, starting with one apartment-style building which will hold about 512 residences. We’re also planning to make chocobo stables available for use to residents of apartment-style housing. Gardening patches are still proving somewhat difficult, but we’re currently developing new “planter pots” that will allow gardening
    (3)

  9. #18
    Player
    Laraul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Posts
    902
    Character
    Laraul Lunacy
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by Victoria_Silverdawn View Post
    A: We'll be increasing the number of plots for existing housing areas in Patch 3.3. After we expand those areas, we'll add apartment-style housing in Ishgard areas afterwards, starting with one apartment-style building which will hold about 512 residences.
    They'll start with one building that holds 512 residents, and that'll be the end of it. No more units after that... why 512 units and not 5120 units? Why are they unwilling to provide ways to allow players to easily reclaim 80% of the cost their current residence? What are they so afraid of? that it would be the first thing that hackers would try to obtain? Or people exploiting the system by selling there residence and then claiming the account was hacked to reclaim the everything? Sure it's possible. But it's not going to destroy the economy. People always complain about the economy, regardless? Or more to the point, people always complain? As I am doing right now?
    (2)

  10. #19
    Player
    Andrea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Posts
    553
    Character
    Princess Andrea
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Alchemist Lv 90
    Personally I feel that when they implemented private rooms they should of allowed everyone to have one at the rising stone as well as a garden plot near the entrance to Mor Dhona.

    Would it have been an amazing way to give everyone houses? No but at least people wouldn't:

    1, Feel they need to join an fc to have a private room.
    2, Potentially lose that private room due to stuff happening outside their control
    3, Everyone would have access to gardening instead of the few who either own houses or are lucky enough to be given access to their fcs one.

    Hell It would have even kinda made sense from a story point you having a room at the scions base of operations.
    (2)

  11. #20
    Player
    crc0427's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Posts
    440
    Character
    Zeo Valefor
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Black Mage Lv 100
    They need to get on the ball with the housing move feature. My FC has been waiting over a year for this.
    (3)

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast