SE please reconsider dev time spent on player vs player

[Kosmos992k]

The only change for PVP required is to allow the Duty Finder for PvP to cover all data centers for a particular region.

By this I mean that all JP data centers would act as 1 for PvP Duty Finder, all NA data centers would act as 1 for PvP DF, and Europe would be screwed....er... No, but seriously, Europe must be included too, so which ever of JP or NA has lower latency from Europe would include the European data center - most likely this would put them back with NA for PvP DF.

Actually, it would be beneficial for 24-man raids to get similar treatment, the LoA, ST and WoD have pretty well horrible Q times and would benefit from a wider selection of potential players. Though they might have to make some adjustments to protect players against lag.

I'd suggest that any full-party or alliance content be considered for such treatment as the number of players Qing for this type of older full-party or alliance content wains.

[AlphaSonic]

snip

Europe can stand by itself. Zodiark the smallest European server is 2 or 3 of the NA/JP smallest servers united. Zodiark would be medium server in NA or JP.

[Kosmos992k]

Europe can stand by itself. Zodiark the smallest European server is 2 or 3 of the NA/JP smallest servers united. Zodiark would be medium server in NA or JP.

I wasn't commenting on or implying anything about the relative size of worlds. If there is a problem with lack of participants in certain content through DF, then the obvious answer is to draw from a wider source of participants. Duty Finder was modified way back to only work within a data center (or rather a group of servers). If not enough people are using DF to enter specific content, then widening the scope seems like an idea - regardless of the relative size (or lack there of) of any given server.