And if I were the tank I'll just let the mobs bite your face off and wipe while laughing. Then again, I don't have a pull macro and even if I did I wouldn't use it outside of raid/trials.



Has SE ever mentioned why their macro system doesn't queue?
For SMN/SCH the macros that swap pet abilities on your bar when you summon a pet are pretty nice. Those are the only macros I use, though.
Q20: Will we ever be able to send tells from within an instanced area?
A20: While the feature can be implemented, it’s currently masked. It’s currently masked because we would like to prevent players from harassing each other just because they know they would never party together in the future. We will continue to monitor the situation carefully as we move forward.
If I remember correctly, it's because they don't want players to cheese through the game by macro-ing multiple actions together.
Which is why I suggested for single action (and probably announcements) macros to be given the ability to queue. I believe it would make a nice QoL update, but I doubt it will happen anytime soon, if it even would.
It's been mentioned before but repeating the lines amounts to a pseudo queue buffer of .1ish seconds per line.If I remember correctly, it's because they don't want players to cheese through the game by macro-ing multiple actions together.
Which is why I suggested for single action (and probably announcements) macros to be given the ability to queue. I believe it would make a nice QoL update, but I doubt it will happen anytime soon, if it even would.



Would you mind elaborating since I'm not sure I follow? Did they say why it would cheese the game? Would allowing macros to queue lead to rotation macros similar to what RIFT ended up with?
What about <mo>? Why would they give us a mouse over command we can't use because macros also break healing spell queues?
I'm not trying to be confrontational or anything. I legit don't understand since as it is now, things can be macro'd together or with text commands such as <t>, <tt>, <mo> etc, but the only reason it isn't common is because it's detrimental in one way or another (DPS loss, slow-to-fire heals).
Seems odd.
Q20: Will we ever be able to send tells from within an instanced area?
A20: While the feature can be implemented, it’s currently masked. It’s currently masked because we would like to prevent players from harassing each other just because they know they would never party together in the future. We will continue to monitor the situation carefully as we move forward.
Pretty much. It was a post from really long ago so I'm not even sure if I remember it correctly. But I do agree that macro could use some QoL upgrades.Would you mind elaborating since I'm not sure I follow? Did they say why it would cheese the game? Would allowing macros to queue lead to rotation macros similar to what RIFT ended up with?
What about <mo>? Why would they give us a mouse over command we can't use because macros also break healing spell queues?
I'm not trying to be confrontational or anything. I legit don't understand since as it is now, things can be macro'd together or with text commands such as <t>, <tt>, <mo> etc, but the only reason it isn't common is because it's detrimental in one way or another (DPS loss, slow-to-fire heals).
Seems odd.
i have an entire hotbar macro system setup so i can change classes in two button presses instead of a letter press and like 4 mouse clicks
/micon 1 gearset
/gs change 1
/hotbar display 8
etc etc. i change classes often cuz crafting/gathering, and indecisive so its useful for me anyway
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.


Reply With Quote




