Would you pay an additional sub fee for housing?

[Fuszion]

I know the idea seems absurd! But money talks and there are A LOT of people that want housing but cant get it because there isn't any available!
There is seriously a shortage of housing on ALL the servers! Enix has stated (true or not) "it would cost them more $$$ for more servers"! If that is the case, then I propose adding more servers for housing, call them "Premium Shards", and charge a buck or two a month for the housing! I may think that that is BS, but I would pay it! And a lot of people would!

Do you agree? Disagree? What?
Please give me your viewpoint on this! Realize, there has to be something in it for Enix (remember, they are a business), and please don't say "how about keeping their subs" or something to that effect because people aren't leaving because of "housing"! I know this because if that were the case, they would have added unlimited housing!

[Whiteroom]

God no, I think this sets a horrible precedent and opens the door to even worse. I would honestly rather see housing removed than be charged for.

And tbh, the sub is enough, housing is something they offered as part of the game, not as a cash bouns, it's up to them to make it work. Frankly with the rumours that SE is not funding them enough, it's totally on SE to make it work and invest more in the game. Player retention is a good reason, a penny saved is a penny earned.

There are some things, like cosmetics, that I'm all for in the cash shop, but never ever content. I really can't stand all these "I want this, so charge me for it threads either." I hate that it's the go to for everyone. There is a difference between "they are a business and need to make money", delivering a high quality product, and "Please gouge us!"

Also, one can assume that some have left with housing being one of their reasons, they don't seem to have an exit poll, so do they even know why people leave, usually people don't leave for one reason though, general discontent or lack of interest with one or two major gripes most likely. Until they start investing more back into the game, I see little reason to add this kind of thing to the cash shop.

[Fuszion]

I respectfully disagree with you! I would rather pay for what I want and am asking for, rather than things I didn't want or ask for!
Plus I don't see the difference between charging for a in game shirt, or an ingame house! I want a house, not a stupid shirt!
I don't want another retainer, I want a house!

I personally thing charging $10 to change your name is a more of a ripoff! I think charging $10 to change or fix your race is a ripoff! I think paying $18 to change servers is a ripoff! Charging for a house? Not so much!

[rjspencer4]

Depends on the price, that and only small houses should be obtainable through real money. If you want a medium house or mansion then you should work for it.

[Whiteroom]

I respectfully disagree with you! I would rather pay for what I want and am asking for, rather than things I didn't want or ask for!
Plus I don't see the difference between charging for a in game shirt, or an ingame house! I want a house, not a stupid shirt!
I don't want another retainer, I want a house!

I personally thing charging $10 to change your name is a more of a ripoff! I think charging $10 to change or fix your race is a ripoff! I think paying $18 to change servers is a ripoff! Charging for a house? Not so much!

It doesn't matter if its a rip off, thats beside the point. What matters is what they are actually selling. Glamours/emotes/fantaisas etc aren't actual content, thats the difference. You need a house, or an fc house to do a lot of the stuff in the game. The lighting outfit does not unlock content for example.

If they are overcharging is an entirely different debate. You are asking that content be gated behind the cash shop.


Not to mention that there are already a lot of free ($ wise, not gil wise) housing in the game, so charging for somethingh that thousands get for free, and is not one time event based, is crazy.


Charging for a second and third house is something that I wouldn't mind however, since you can only have one per character.

What really needs to happen is for them to revamp the housing system, not have this half assed limited one.

[Dualblade]

No /10chars

[Silverbear]

No Thks. Besides even if you could if no plots are open whats the point? Still not getting a house

[Sakuraluna]

No! Just no, no, no no no. We already have to pay an extra sub for storage space. I don't play a pay to play game to be nickel and dimed.

[CGMidlander]

@Title nope

[Judah_Brandt]

Anything close to an in game advantage for real money is a no-no. Especially since your idea is poorly thought out at best. I.E. - I pay $5 for a house then sell it in game for Gil. And if you were to rebut with "houses can only be bought with real money" then I would gladly call it an even worse idea lol.