SE knows a billing address willing provided to them and a credit card number.

To assume the police would visit the person at their home was the most invasive aspect IMO.

Nothing this person writes is admissible as evidence in any legal way. There is no way to confirm the person registered to the account, is making these statements at all. To suggest that a private company make decisions about whether police should be dispatched to a persons residence is alarming, in my opinion.

It opens the door too wide for any kind of speech that anyone deems threatening or unusual on a relatively anonymous platform, to incur some kind of investigation from local authorities. Not to mention various nations have various laws regarding speech and it's protection.