LOL, they'll never please anyone. I love how you call an entire group of the community "crybabies" in a post where you are essentially bawling.
Here's the thing: The STR vs. VIT debate has been perhaps one of the biggest sources of toxicity in this game's tanking meta if not the entire community. Now all of that venom is going away, yet people such as yourself are still clinging to it. Who cares if its not as EDGEY anymore cause you aren't pulling 10 mobs with 16K HP and walking away? Now it just means you can pull 15 mobs and do the same thing.
It is EXTREMELY likely that after the tickle-me-tank-busters of A1-4S and the STR meta/tank-stance-less-meta of 3.0-3.1, combined with these changes, that bosses in Midas and probably in 3.2 in general are going to hit much harder.
What challenge are you referring to here? The idea that you have to click different gear onto your character sheet? Mad skillz yo. Or perhaps its that you had to rotate cooldowns? Um, all good tanks do that whether they're in STR or VIT.
The mechanics of how to play PLD, WAR, or DRK are the same regardless of whether they are STR or VIT spec. It makes zero difference. All it means is you're dealing more damage because of gear. Saying that it is a challenge to sacrifice VIT for STR is woefully hypocritical when people have established for ages now that that "sacrifice" does not increase the damage you take or make you any harder to heal. You're not sacrificing much of anything at all, in fact you're just giving yourself a freebie. STR tanking is EASIER. Its the same illusion of difficulty that beating FFVIII without leveling up had. Sure you were really low level but the mechanics of the game actually made it WAY easier to play through and, frankly, break, in that way. Tanking out of tank stance is another animal entirely, as that actually DOES increase the damage you take (well, not if you're a WAR, but it does rob you of IB and EQ healing), and also hurts your enmity generation. But going full STR instead of VIT? That is not that huge of an accomplishment, or challenge.
On that note, probably the only way they'll break aggressive tanking playstyles is if they lock you into a stance upon engaging mobs/bosses. Which will absolutely never happen because then tank-swaps would be extremely cumbersome to implement.
This won't fucking break anything by itself. PLD/WAR/DRK will still have the same rotations and relative damage caps barring some other adjustments that have nothing to do with the STR/VIT thing. It won't change the way you play your job, at all in the slightest. MAYBE the numbers on the screen will be a few hundred points smaller (but that isn't even confirmed one way or another). Who the hell cares? You're still playing your job the same so you're still pushing the job's DPS ceiling (right?) just as you always would. Even Xeno and Layla would tell you to gtfo and play DPS if the damage output of tanking is the sole attraction for you.
This change does not change the way we play our jobs. It just makes it so that we all have a uniform relative DPS ceiling and nobody will be able shit on eachother for their choice in gear anymore, and the only indication of skill will be the knowledge and expertise you have at your job, as it fucking should be. Anyone who believes otherwise, IMO, needs to reevaluate their reasons for tanking and/or re-roll.
I have a feeling you are one of the STR tanks that forgets tank stance on massive AoE pulls and forgets CDs for tank busters. Otherwise no healer would be complaining.
Either way, in a few weeks STR tanks and VIT tanks will be dinosaurs, there will only be good tanks doing their jobs and outputting whatever the maximum DPS is, and bad tanks doing neither of those things, and we won't be getting lost in the haze of bullshit of all this "oh well he/she was wearing xyz accessories blah blah blah herp-derp-this-that-the-other lolololol wut a scrub", and no variances in STR vs. VIT will be masking poor play. So all you truly bad tanks out there right now, whether you're in STR or VIT, you're about to get exposed.



Reply With Quote

