Issue with double standards with Se and defining between dps and support.

[Kelevra]

Using the current balance as a starting point, for increased damage I'd say you need submit to a decrease in utility. Even DRG which has great dps is behind MNK, monk's utility is marginal at best, you bring them for damage only. This is the way the game is balanced, we don't get awesome utility and awesome dps in the same jobs.

You also seem to be disregarding the fact that nearly every raid group wants a bard or machinist for their utility not because of their dps. A lot of groups will even put up with less than average dps out of a bard/machinist because they want them there for utility.

1. That would be something I'd be open to.

2. I wouldn't downplay Dragon Kick. An Int debuff is something that nearly every raid group desires as well.

3. Drg has awesome dps and Battle Litany. Battle Litany is an awesome utility imo.

[whiskeybravo]

1. That would be something I'd be open to.

2. I wouldn't downplay Dragon Kick. An Int debuff is something that nearly every raid group desires as well.

3. Drg has awesome dps and Battle Litany. Battle Litany is an awesome utility imo.

Wasn't really trying to downplay DK, but DRK has the same Int down. The only additional thing is traited Mantra which is nice, but neither is a raid dps increase like disembowel or battle litany. Yea, litany is great, and drg has slightly less personal dps (than monk) because of it.

I think they should make a more damage focused brd/mch job instead of reworking brd/mch to do more dps at the cost of their current utility.

Dungeons/VA etc can be cleared by dps who only press 1 button over and over, so why waste time messing with something that works fine as is.

Not if EVERY dps was only pushing one button xD

[Nyghtmarerobu]

Why does bard need a buff? Because somebody had a fail Duty finder with 4 bards? 4 prolly, not i200+ bards. Prolly not even main bards. Bards don't need a buff, neither do Machinists.