Issue with double standards with Se and defining between dps and support.

[Arrik]

But that is what I'm saying.

Well at least with multiple support classes you will only have 1 who takes a DPS loss.

That's not what you said. More than 1 support dps is not just a dps loss for 1 as stated. It may be a loss of 1 over the other support dps (which may be what you ment) but they are all clearly behind a regular dps so they are all taking a dps loss for simply existing.

...random party comp of:

Paladin, Paladin, Astrologian, Astrologian, Bard, Bard, Bard, Bard (and they all rotate Foe's as you suggest)


yeah....no thank you

The horror!