When is the PS3 Version going to get cancelled?

[Kosmos992k]

That being said, I wish PS3 was dropped rather tomorrow than the day after, because PS3 is the sole reason we can't have nice things
PS3 limitations, the everyday argument from our lovely dev team why NOTHING can be implemented the way we'd wish it to be.

That's incorrect. The game caters for platforms such as the PS3 and low end PCs taht do not have the graphical oomph to run the game with bells and whistles at even 720p resolution. As such, catering to the PS3 in effects holds the door open to a lot of PC players with less than stellar hardware.

You claim that PS3 limitations is the everyday explanation from the developers for why such and such a thing can't be implemented, that is really not the case. It is however the everyday assumed reason, that assumption being made by many players of the game and in particular PC players who blame PS3 for the lack of the magical HD texture pack.

[CrimsonThunder]

Lol, my fiance played all the way up to A1S on PS3 with no issues outside of piss poor loading times. The only reason the change became necessary is that the PS3 can't handle Alexander very well so it frequently caused crashes.

Someone is either a troll or bitter.

[Atoli]

You claim that PS3 limitations is the everyday explanation from the developers for why such and such a thing can't be implemented, that is really not the case.
It is however the everyday assumed reason, that assumption being made by many players of the game and in particular PC players who blame PS3 for the lack of the magical HD texture pack.

HD textures is pretty much the last thing I'd care about, and I have a PC who could run everything on max settings perfectly. And while you are right that often it is just what players ASSUME to be the reason, there have been several instances where SE said "we can't do that because the PS3 wouldn't be able to handle it", which is probably the reason why now so many people jump to that as the standard reason, since they heard it so often before.

But, like Kuwagami said, even if the PS3 support was dropped, low-grade PCs would still be supported, one day the PS4 will be considered old, and so on. We just can't have nice things, can we?

[Kosmos992k]

HD textures is pretty much the last thing I'd care about, and I have a PC who could run everything on max settings perfectly. And while you are right that often it is just what players ASSUME to be the reason, there have been several instances where SE said "we can't do that because the PS3 wouldn't be able to handle it", which is probably the reason why now so many people jump to that as the standard reason, since they heard it so often before.

But, like Kuwagami said, even if the PS3 support was dropped, low-grade PCs would still be supported, one day the PS4 will be considered old, and so on. We just can't have nice things, can we?

Well, we can, but it more depends on the game architecture. Almost every discussion about requests that SE can/cant do ends up coming down to the memory budget. Immediately everyone assumes that the limited memory on the PS3 is therefore the problem. However more often than not the memory budget is referencing how much data encompasses a character and therefore how much has to be written back to the DB every 15 seconds.

[Reynhart]

And while you are right that often it is just what players ASSUME to be the reason, there have been several instances where SE said "we can't do that because the PS3 wouldn't be able to handle it"

You're right.
Something like "Why can't we have zones like in 1.0 ?" (i.e huge and painfully empty)
Yep, such a greeeeaaaaaaat loss, damn those PS3 players and their subpar hardware...