Ha ha... not quite.
How do you know the BLM actually ignored the criticism? Maybe they adjusted their play-style in the next dungeon they did.
If you're rude in your criticism, no matter how justified the criticism is... if you're rude about it then there is absolutely no reason to *immediately* adjust to what the criticism was about.
You're right that they should still think about it... but if the criticism was rude, they are fully justified in taking their sweet time to think about it later, and troll the hell out of whoever-was-being-rude in the first place.
That's just the rules for being part of a normal society.
Ah, this topic again
I can't help but wonder why these threads are always started with a chatlog showing one thing and one thing only: that the OP is an insensitive, rude person who can't believe someone didn't take his "advice" when the advice was basically "shut up and do what I say because I say so".
Personally, I hold all roles by the same standards.
If they kind of suck, I'm annoyed, but I won't throw a huge fit over it. I'll just keep that annoyance to myself or if it was unbearably annoying, I'll bitch to friends about it afterwards.
If they suck big time (as in, making it impossible to clear the dungeon), I explain to them what they should do in a friendly manner with easy explanations why that would be better.
(if they react in a very defensive way or with insults, I simply leave, because I don't have to waste my time or nerves with them if they are not willing to learn no matter the circumstances. But that only happened once so far in thousands of runs of all kinds of content, so yeah...)
The result:
countless people who actually listened to my advice and applied it on the spot and zero kicks since the start of ARR.
"It's not what you say, but how you say it.", keep that in mind![]()
I have this same mindset. I have been kicked zero times since the beginning. And I've met only 1 person who will straight up ignore what was asked of them.
I have a hunch if I start criticizing in the same manner as OP, I'll see a increase in players ignoring my advice. Because most people don't want to accept feeling little and listen when they are talked down to like their inferior.
You vaguely recall more misinformation. Please do a little checking into the things you make up.Well when you get reported one day I'll be here having fun while you are sitting raging you can't play anymore
also FFXIV is designed to for solo players. Use of Duty Finder is strongly encoraged by the game itself and many quests cannot be done with a group due to private instancing. It's a pain in the butt to try and play with a friend.
They're third party software and thus against the TOS, Yoshi-P has stated he dislikes them because it breeds eliteism and thus has no plans to add one. (I vaugely recall talk of them consdieirng adding one that shows Your own and only your own DPS to appese the self improvement crowd though). They have and will ban players that publicly admit to using them.
Already admitted that, is an unfortunate side-effect it had on players with poor priorities.
Now that's just a lie. You really want to pretend the fact everyone will know you got out-dpssed by a healer won't drive people to get better at dpsing?
If I started to be treated like a piriah because I got out-dpsed by a holy priest as a mage of any kind where everyone could see, I think I'd want to up my performance. I would realize I'm doing something VERY wrong.
I've out-dpsed a DRG on single target as a SCH in arbetorium, and I'm sure that guy wasn't aware that he needed help until I let him know. You know what else would help his awareness? A readily available DAMAGE METER.
Recount also had death logs, and 'damage taken' features, so no, you're actually wrong about that. If someone died to something, it's just as easy to see where they took damage they shouldn't have, and how long they went without healing down to fractions of a second. That was helpful for singling out a certain shitty shaman who kept killing himself to mechanics vs sindragosa back in icecrown citadel because he wouldn't stop attacking the boss when it kept giving him a stacking DOT. I referred to recount to see it in detail.
You call that unreliable?
Last edited by Reilyn; 01-27-2016 at 12:30 AM.
Sorry for the double.
Never said it does. Some apologists here emulate the mentality well enough. Do you not know what a comparison is?
Oh! You mean like what the very people you're defending did to the OP trying to help?!
Which the OP did.
Too bad the OP was the one that got kicked, and the person you quoted says they deserved it, when he didn't.
*refers to first post again*
All I see is him asking if he was indeed communicating with human beings, and 'why aren't you using enochian?'.
If someone gets butthurt over that, I'm telling you from first-hand experience; no amount of tact will fix people with too much ego, and don't want to learn, and the apologists here defend those people.
Not really. They don't care as long as you don't use it to harras people.Originally Posted by Lego3400
They're third party software and thus against the TOS, Yoshi-P has stated he dislikes them because it breeds eliteism and thus has no plans to add one. (I vaugely recall talk of them consdieirng adding one that shows Your own and only your own DPS to appese the self improvement crowd though). They have and will ban players that publicly admit to using them.
Proof: http://sqex.to/iS7
'We saw the Elysium clear video, and when they cried out at the end it was amazing!'
They were using parsers as well as (third party) audio alarms for mechanics iirc and Yoshi-P has no problem at all with their clear or playstyle.
Idk if there was ever a raid group who got punished, because there exists a (public) video of their run with parsers. I don't think so.
Last edited by Neophyte; 01-27-2016 at 01:03 AM.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
Cookie Policy
This website uses cookies. If you do not wish us to set cookies on your device, please do not use the website. Please read the Square Enix cookies policy for more information. Your use of the website is also subject to the terms in the Square Enix website terms of use and privacy policy and by using the website you are accepting those terms. The Square Enix terms of use, privacy policy and cookies policy can also be found through links at the bottom of the page.