4Gamer Interview with Yoshi-P!

[Kaurie]

Did...you not connect the dots? I said that an exception to the rule does not invalidate the rule. You countered by saying that it does because that's how science works. And I countered that by saying that quantum physics breaks the rules science is built on. So that means that either all out science is wrong because quantum physics is an exception to normal science, or that as an exception, it does not invalidate normal science.

I couldn't connect the dots, because I couldn't understand your ramble of a post. When I asked for clarification you linked an article to Quantum Physics :|

Although, your clarified post helps a lot. Thanks. I would say that, generally speaking then, that is how science works. You are always trying to prove something as false. You make a hypothesis and then try to prove it wrong, and keep experimenting. The more times you experiment and cannot prove it incorrect, the more likely it is to be true. However, as soon as you prove it false, you have it.

When i am talking about how science works, I mean that is the methodology of science (or Scientific Method). I am not sure if that was clear.

SNIP

PS Velhart, just letting you know I didn't just bail on our discussion. I gave you a +1/Like/Thumbs up, because I think you make a good argument. That said, I do disagree for the most part. It all comes back to my initial post that there are great arguments on both sides for/against traits/specializations etc., and it doesn't look like either side is going to convince the other side to change their minds.