Results 1 to 10 of 848

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player
    MrPresident's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    329
    Character
    Casper Colt
    World
    Cerberus
    Main Class
    Summoner Lv 90
    Come on Yoshi.

    If you banned parsers there wouldn't be groups of people going "oh no what about Teamspeak?!"

    Other than that it all sounds good, in theory at least. Less abuse and less cheating is always a good thing. As well as the much needed Dark Knight buff!
    (0)

  2. #2
    Player
    xxczx's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2015
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    444
    Character
    Dark Falz
    World
    Omega
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by MrPresident View Post
    Come on Yoshi.

    If you banned parsers there wouldn't be groups of people going "oh no what about Teamspeak?!"
    If you actually read the message, he is saying that they will be using different encryption for PvP to make parsers not work in PvP but still work in PvE.

    and I'm not sure what you're getting at with Teamspeak, must be pretty good solo Qs you're doing when the team is on Teamspeak.
    (0)

  3. #3
    Player
    Canadane's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    7,505
    Character
    King Canadane
    World
    Hyperion
    Main Class
    Sage Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by Naoki_Yoshida View Post
    ■Ranked Matchmaking Ranges■
    ...
    Should you have any comments or suggestions regarding this issue, we invite you to submit them.
    Why not have this matchmaking based off rating, not tier? Tier can be fine for issuing rewards and a general glance at someones rank. But because tiers can have overlapping rating points, it's not the best indication of where someone currently is, comparatively speaking.

    Quote Originally Posted by Naoki_Yoshida View Post
    ■Job Balance■
    At this time, we are planning to make several adjustments, in particular to strengthen both dark knight and ninja in PvP, with patch 3.3. These adjustments are still being tested internally, and so we ask that you please wait a little longer.
    I was going to wait until the end of the season, but I figure nows a good time for some feedback. There's been quite the statement on healers, regarding our inability to really affect the battle as it's all on the DPS burst. However, if you feel that healing in general is as it should be, I'd suggest looking at Scholar at the very least. It seems to be the least appropriate for The Feast. The shields take longer to cast than AST, the regens not at on-demand as WHM or AST, and the general cure potency overall is lesser than WHM, especially considering WHMs pvp skills. Once your Lustrates are used up, unless you're willing to disperse your faerie you've got a tactical disadvantage comparatively speaking top the other healer types. And then without your faerie you've got no recovery from low HP Attunement use.

    I'm trying my best to continue the rank climb as Scholar but I can feel the real pressure from the limitations of the job. I struggle between rationalizing it as my own skill or a fundamental issue with Scholar in PvP. As I see it, Scholar is an amazing supporting healer for PvP, not the best main healer. I have never felt the pressure in other level 60 pvp modes, but this was because I've usually had a co-healer to keep the HP flowing properly. Scholar excels at quick spot heals, but time after time again I end up in deadlock matches when the DPS cannot land a kill for some reason or another, and it's obvious the two with the proper mindset are the opposing healers. It's not until I see 5 (or more!) Culling Time stacks, it's to the point where I cannot out-heal the opposing healer if it's a WHM or an AST. Normally I wouldn't make such generalized statements, but it's happened on multiple occasions to me, including both high and low ranked DPS comrades.

    When I look up at what I just wrote out, it comes off as more of a rant than anything perhaps. But I hope you accept the feedback one way or another.
    (7)

    http://king.canadane.com

  4. #4
    Player
    Rufalus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Gridania
    Posts
    2,730
    Character
    Lufie Newleaf
    World
    Ragnarok
    Main Class
    Monk Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by MrPresident View Post
    Come on Yoshi.

    If you banned parsers there wouldn't be groups of people going "oh no what about Teamspeak?!"
    Quote Originally Posted by xxczx View Post
    If you actually read the message, he is saying that they will be using different encryption for PvP to make parsers not work in PvP but still work in PvE.

    and I'm not sure what you're getting at with Teamspeak, must be pretty good solo Qs you're doing when the team is on Teamspeak.
    MrP was referring to the line:
    As prohibiting the use of third-party tools can lead some to confusion (”Are chat programs prohibited?” “What falls within the definition of “third-party tool?”)


    So he was just saying he doubts that players will be confused about the distinction between parsers and chat programs like TeamSpeak when the developers talk about outlawing third-party tools.
    (2)