Astrologian misconceptions

[Vlady]

I definitely agree with this but Astrologian is a completely new potent job now. The main problem people have with AST is that it is the middle ground between whm and sch. They want AST to be a unique class that does things differently than the previous two. I don't think there is a problem. Evidence already shows that AST can hold their ground in extreme content like Alex Savage. I'm a good AST... really good. I have seen bad Astrologians and there is a clear skill gap between us that keeps one doing great in savage and one flunking.

I just love seeing these self promoting I am so leet threads hidden behind a supposed real message. Yes we know in your last 15 posts you are really good and just everyone else that complains about astro job is sub par. Astrologian still has its issues even though it is on par with the other two healers. Still has some lack luster cooldowns despite its insanely strong healing cooldown.

Could use another option to maybe even temporarily reduce rng on cards as well. Bole would be immensely more useful if we could time it for an actual defensive need. And nocturnal stance should be revised a bit to give us a more offensive edge with it possibly replacing cleric stance without affecting our healing ability. That way we could in essence perform the role of the scholar with maybe reduced mana costs on our dps oriented spells and a boost in dps potency but not as strong as cleric stance.

Please leave the ego at home as it undermines your entire post. A person does not have to be an elite player to have a valid opinion or critique of a job.