Results 1 to 10 of 648

Dev. Posts

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Player Kaurie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2015
    Posts
    2,427
    Character
    Kaurie Lorhart
    World
    Leviathan
    Main Class
    Summoner Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by Ibi View Post
    Which it sounds like SE are going to do in 3.2, and it'll be interesting to see the results.
    Yes it will be interesting. I think that we need to not over-simplify things. As you say down below:
    However, a lot of the damage that's been done may be irreversible. There are likely players who quit based on the difficulty of Savage (who would have stayed around if it had instead been at Coil difficulty and they'd been more able to make progress) who won't come back regardless of how difficult Midas is.
    Further, there are things coming out this year that may take people away from the game. It's quite possible that the tuned down raid will be more widely enjoyed, but may receive fewer clear numbers due to already lost players and/or losing players to other games. I know that I am leaning more and more towards moving to WoW for Legion's launch with each live letter/interview that I read.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibi View Post
    My suspicion is that even if every single person that's cleared A4S to this point clears A8S in the first two weeks and quits because they have absolutely nothing else to do (which would say as much about the non-raiding content available, or lack thereof), the impact on the economy will be negligible and you'll actually end up with a higher percentage of the players tackling and succeeding in Savage that you have now.

    But that's just my feeling, and I have no data to back it up, so I'm not going to try and claim that it's "common sense" (or anything similar) that that will be the outcome.
    Unfortunately, we have a severe lack of data. Further, the data we do have is prone to being misinterpreted, due to the lack of other data. I think you make an alright argument, but I'd say that the higher end raiders make a pretty significant impact on the economy. I know that raiding food and potions are quite expensive, but are rarely used outside of progression. At least, I've never known anyone to eat HQ foods or use HQ pots in dungeons/expert roulette (or even Void Ark), but I've almost never seen someone not use these in Alexander Savage (or coil). If the prices are as high as they are, the demand must be pretty high or the supply pretty short - I'm honestly unsure of which - but would guess it's demand. If the hardcore raiders left, that is a significant chunk of players who want to be on the 'bleeding edge' of progression. Once mid-core groups get there, they can get away with not having food/pots, as they are generally geared well enough to make the DPS checks without them. This is my reasoning for believing that Hardcore Raiders have a significant crafting impact.
    On top of that, you likely will lose some hardcore players due to it being too easy. If Gordias had been at Coil-level difficulty, you might still have lost those players, but now they're going to lose them in addition to the group they already lost by alienating them with Gordias' difficulty, rather than losing them instead of that group.
    That said, i don't think that lowering Midas difficulty will all of a sudden remove hardcore raiders from the game. I think uninspired, recycled content and lackluster responses to consumer feedback are what will.

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibi View Post
    Based on the WoW numbers, where they have the two intermediate difficulties and see similar levels of player engagement, I suspect it might not have made a huge difference. That's something I'd like to be wrong about though.

    Unfortunately, I don't think it's practical even with a much larger development team (if it's even possible) to get small enough gradients to get people from where Alexander Normal is to where Alexander Savage is. Even more so if you're doing it by repeating the same fights multiple times at slightly higher difficulty each time.
    I don't think they needed to make more encounters, but simply tune the encounters they have.

    A4 should be much harder than it is
    A3 should be harder than it is
    A2 should be slightly harder than it is
    A1 should be as is

    A1S should be as is
    A2S should be harder than it is
    A3S should be easier than it is
    A4S should be as is

    This would have a more natural progression of difficulty

    Quote Originally Posted by Ibi View Post
    It'd be interesting to know how many people who couldn't beat A3S prior to having weapons from Thordan extreme obtained them and went on to beat A3S.
    I doubt this made much of a difference. If all of my SMN stats were made to INT equivalents using stat weights - I had with my 200 eso weapon 3404 INT. With my Relic, I am at 3445. Thordan EX would have been about half way in between. That 40 INT gain to my relic is roughly a 1% increase in INT, and has indeed given me about a 1% increase in DPS - from 1333 to 1343 on my dummy parse. The issue is that all stats, including weapon damage and main stat, are becoming less important with each gear step (diminishing returns and all).
    (0)
    Last edited by Kaurie; 01-16-2016 at 03:18 AM.