Quote Originally Posted by Alahra View Post
Just because the data looks a certain way to them and they later decide to change something based on a new interpretation or based on player feedback doesn't mean they were outright lying or anything. They've usually been nothing but transparent (except regarding housing--and I'll agree that was one of their biggest blunders since relaunch).
It's also their wording though that makes it problematic. It comes off as condescending when they come out to say "We think it's fine, the players probably don't know how to play their job", only to immdeiately turn tail on it within weeks (in the case of GB/WM anyway). And I don't necessarily mean lying, but rather their (in)competence and outlook in general. Like another example is, how do you not foresee WM/GB being a damage loss (or barely breaking above) if it only boosts your damage by 20%, when auto attacks make up for roughly 22-24% at the time