Page 31 of 34 FirstFirst ... 21 29 30 31 32 33 ... LastLast
Results 301 to 310 of 331

Thread: Strength Tanks

  1. #301
    Player
    EvilHippie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    86
    Character
    Evil Hippie
    World
    Sargatanas
    Main Class
    Marauder Lv 60
    This is either an awful tank thread posted by an uninformed tank that has no idea how to maths, or it is a brilliant troll.
    (1)

  2. #302
    Player
    AegisKiddo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2016
    Posts
    49
    Character
    Alpha R-type
    World
    Gilgamesh
    Main Class
    Warrior Lv 80
    A healer complaining about Tanks in slaying gear, I can't help but sigh
    (1)

  3. #303
    Player
    Mimilu's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    3,990
    Character
    Mimiji Miji
    World
    Exodus
    Main Class
    Dancer Lv 100
    Quote Originally Posted by EvilHippie View Post
    This is either an awful tank thread posted by an uninformed tank that has no idea how to maths, or it is a brilliant troll.
    I'd go with the later considering the character that is attached to their forum account only has one class at level 1, Gladiator. :B
    (0)

  4. #304
    Player
    AlexiIvaniskavich's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2014
    Posts
    200
    Character
    Hrothgar Grulag
    World
    Zalera
    Main Class
    Dark Knight Lv 60
    i miss bacon thread...... but it was glorious while it lasted

    honestly though, the argument on how you like your bacon is the same argument that appears here in these forums constantly STR v VIT. What matters is that you do your job and eat your bacon (tank and hold hate). Whether you prefer str or vit (chewy/crispy) at the end of the day, for the majority of content, it doesn't matter.

    I joked about the extremism of bacon types and which side you must stand, but IMO, it is a wonderful analogy of this eternal argument. There are those who will argue for VIT only, there are those who will argue STR only (to the hp minimum atleast) and there are those in between. Yes, mods, you have every right to remove those posts, but in doing so I feel that you have failed to see the big picture. WE ALL LOVE TO TANK, and though I may disagree with how you bacon... errr tank, at the end of the day we are united under that banner of being a tank.

    Sometimes we need a bit of levity and to take a step back and remember these things. Sometimes we need to laugh at the silliness of the situation and realize how ridiculous some of these stances take. Tongue in Cheek. Satire. An opportunity to see the results of the same type of argument while making fun of that argument.

    I would encourage mods to place those posts back for these reasons listed above. (as punishment i shall not mention bacon in any other posts for the remainder of 3.1x)

    Rest in Peace, Bacon thread. Like actual bacon, your existence was too short lived.
    (3)

  5. #305
    Player
    Donjo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Ul'dah
    Posts
    980
    Character
    A'lyhhia Tahz
    World
    Lamia
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 80
    Quote Originally Posted by AlexiIvaniskavich View Post
    Rest in Peace, Bacon thread. Like actual bacon, your existence was too short lived.
    No, don't give up!

    BACONBACONBACONBACONBACON!!!!!
    (1)

  6. #306
    Player
    keyburz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Posts
    152
    Character
    Key Burz
    World
    Cactuar
    Main Class
    Arcanist Lv 60
    If a tank wants to wear strength accessories, fine do it. But you better not be the tank that also doesnt use cooldowns, which just so happens to be the only tanks that I've ever encountered that wore strength accessories. This is why I dont like tanks wearing strength. Because the bad tanks wearing strength are ruining it for everyone.
    The good tank says "the healer seems capable, I'm considering wearing strength for this encounter." The bad tank says "DUH I wear strength! More damage! Works great with standing in the aoes as well, so I can have 100% uptime on damage!" Given the choice of a bad tank standing in aoes with vitality accessories or strength, i'll take vitality.
    (3)
    Last edited by keyburz; 01-15-2016 at 06:15 PM.

  7. #307
    Player
    Hayward's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Limsa Lominsa
    Posts
    857
    Character
    Hayward Timberwolf
    World
    Adamantoise
    Main Class
    Summoner Lv 70
    Quote Originally Posted by keyburz View Post
    If a tank wants to wear strength accessories, fine do it. But you better not be the tank that also doesnt use cooldowns, which just so happens to be the only tanks that I've ever encountered that wore strength accessories. This is why I dont like tanks wearing strength. Because the bad tanks wearing strength are ruining it for everyone.
    The good tank says "the healer seems capable, I'm considering wearing strength for this encounter." The bad tank says "DUH I wear strength! More damage! Works great with standing in the aoes as well, so I can have 100% uptime on damage!" Given the choice of a bad tank standing in aoes with vitality accessories or strength, i'll take vitality.
    In case anyone is wondering, THIS^^ is why I use the term "Leeroy Tank".
    (1)

  8. #308
    Player

    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    644
    XD Duh ! Damaging if i advoid aoe i loose time on my GCD !
    (0)

  9. #309
    Player
    Artemiz's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    709
    Character
    Darwinian Origin
    World
    Twintania
    Main Class
    Paladin Lv 90
    Just want to pipe and thank the contributors of this thread, as a returning player I only got my PLD to 60 yesterday but I've been reading threads like these so I have a better understanding of how to gear up, so far the only STR pieces I'm equiping are rings but I'm only at 15.9k HP with the gear I have. As my gear improves I'm going to be phasing out VIT pieces to maintain 16.5-17k HP, as a veteran FF11 PLD I know just how effctive damage is when keeping hate so to be honest this argument brings back memories of that game when the turtle PLD's simply wouldn't have it that a DPS PLD was far superior for maintaining hate, once Attonment came out though that argument was settled with ease.

    I haven't contributed to the thread but like many others (I suspect) I have read it and learned from it, cheers guys.
    (4)

  10. #310
    Player
    Blitzace's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Limsa
    Posts
    532
    Character
    Blitz Ace
    World
    Odin
    Main Class
    Gladiator Lv 80
    Honestly. once again, STR or VIT do what ever you like.

    But people defending VIT right now... you make me laugh. I'm fine with you going full VIT, honestly. if you can keep hate and do your thing, Thats great! But me and others, would like to get the most out of our classes, meaning We rather do more DMG than having a bit more HP which does nothing basicly. It doesn't reduce DMG. its just flat out more HP. Unless there is a big tank buster involved, VIT is not needed. is that bad? Maybe. thats why they're gonna change it probably.

    But don't be bashing STR tanks cause you don't like the way people play. I like to get the most out of my class, be that when i'm tanking or healing or even on a DPS job.
    And yes, ofcourse there are bad tanks. That has nothing to do with STR or VIT. have seen plenty of bad tanks in full VIT. that does not mean i'm gonna call every single tank with full vit a bad player.

    No, thats the way they wanna play and if it works and they're not holding back their PT. thats perfectly fine. But in most content, the excessive amount of VIT is just not even remotely needed. and thats a fact.
    (4)

Page 31 of 34 FirstFirst ... 21 29 30 31 32 33 ... LastLast